Hepatitis Monthly

Published by: Kowsar

Criteria to Assess a Randomized Controlled Pilot Study: Response to Letter

Sonia Oveisi 1 , *
Author Information
1 Metabolic Diseases Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, IR Iran
Article information
  • Hepatitis Monthly: March 01, 2013, 13 (4); e10867
  • Published Online: March 17, 2013
  • Article Type: Reply
  • Received: February 19, 2013
  • Accepted: February 23, 2013
  • DOI: 10.5812/hepatmon.10867

To Cite: Oveisi S. Criteria to Assess a Randomized Controlled Pilot Study: Response to Letter, Hepat Mon. 2013 ;13(4):e10867. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.10867.

Copyright © 2013, Kowsar Corp. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Kabir A. Should We Rely on the Findings of Each Published Randomized Controlled Study? Hepat Mon. 2013; 13(3)
  • 2. Avins AL. Can unequal be more fair? Ethics, subject allocation, and randomised clinical trials. J Med Ethics. 1998; 24(6): 401-8
  • 3. Buyse ME. Analysis of clinical trial outcomes: some comments on subgroup analyses. Control Clin Trials. 1989; 10(4 Suppl): 187S-94S[PubMed]
  • 4. Lachin JM. Statistical properties of randomization in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1988; 9(4): 289-311[DOI]
  • 5. Rosenberger J. STAT 503 - Design of Experiments. 2012;
  • 6. Guide for authors ,Anesthesia and analgesia the gold standard in Anesthesiology. 2012;
  • 7. Mills JL. Data torturing. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(16): 1196-9[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments