Risk Factors for Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Cirrhosis Awaiting Liver Transplantation in Shiraz, Iran

AUTHORS

Kamran Bagheri Lankarani 1 , * , Katayon Homayon 2 , Dorna Motevalli 1 , Seyed Taghi Heidari 1 , Seyed Moayed Alavian 3 , 4 , Seyed Ali Malek-Hosseini 5

1 Health Policy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IR Iran

2 Gastroenterology and Hepatology Rearch Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IR Iran

3 Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Baghiatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

4 Tehran Hepatitis Center , Tehran, IR Iran

5 Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IR Iran

How to Cite: Bagheri Lankarani K, Homayon K, Motevalli D, Heidari S T, Alavian S M, et al. Risk Factors for Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Cirrhosis Awaiting Liver Transplantation in Shiraz, Iran, Hepat Mon. 2015 ; 15(12):e26407. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.26407.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Hepatitis Monthly: 15 (12); e26407
Published Online: December 27, 2015
Article Type: Research Article
Received: December 25, 2014
Revised: November 12, 2015
Accepted: November 28, 2015
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: Portal vein thrombosis is a fairly common and potentially life-threatening complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. The risk factors for portal vein thrombosis in these patients are still not fully understood.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the associations between various risk factors in cirrhotic patients and the development of portal vein thrombosis.

Patients and Methods: In this case-control study performed at the Shiraz organ transplantation center, Iran, we studied 219 patients (> 18 years old) with liver cirrhosis, who were awaiting liver transplants in our unit, from November 2010 to May 2011. The patients were evaluated by history, physical examination, and laboratory tests, including factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation, Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2) mutation, and serum levels of protein C, protein S, antithrombin III, homocysteine, factor VIII, and anticardiolipin antibodies.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the assessed hypercoagulable states between patients with or without portal vein thrombosis. A history of previous variceal bleeding with subsequent endoscopic treatment in patients with portal vein thrombosis was significantly higher than in those without it (P = 0.013, OR: 2.526, 95% CI: 1.200 - 5.317).

Conclusions: In our population of cirrhotic patients, treatment of variceal bleeding predisposed the patients to portal vein thrombosis, but hypercoagulable disorders by themselves were not associated with portal vein thrombosis.

Keywords

Portal Vein Thrombosis Endoscopic Treatment Esophageal Varices Liver Transplantation Iran Liver Cirrhosis Risk Factors

Copyright © 2015, Kowsar Corp. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Background

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a potentially detrimental complication of liver cirrhosis that may lead to worsening of liver function, unexpected episodes of esophageal variceal bleeding, hyperdynamic circulation, and intestinal ischemia (1, 2). Depending on the method of diagnosis and the stage of cirrhosis, the prevalence of PVT in cirrhotic patients ranges from < 0.6% in compensated cirrhosis (3) to 28% in liver transplant candidates (4-7). PVT may make liver transplantation more technically difficult (8, 9).

In most patients, PVT is diagnosed as an incidental finding, but in some patients it presents with decompensation of chronic liver disease. It is not yet completely clear whether PVT is a consequence of severe liver cirrhosis or an aggravating factor, or both. The main pathogenic factor of PVT in cirrhosis is the decreased portal flow due to architectural liver damage, but acquired and inherited clotting abnormalities may play a role (10). There have been controversial findings regarding risk factors for this complication in cirrhotic patients. Male sex, previous surgery or endoscopic treatment for portal hypertension, history of variceal bleeding, low platelet count, hepatocellular carcinoma, and advanced liver failure have been postulated as possible risk factors for PVT (11, 12). There are also contradictory findings on the role of genetic mutations in the predisposition to this condition in cirrhotic patients (10, 13).

2. Objectives

The present study aimed to investigate the associations between various inherited and acquired risk factors in cirrhotic patients and the development of PVT.

3. Patients and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2010 to May 2011 at Shiraz liver transplantation center at Namazi general hospital in Shiraz, Iran (the only national liver transplantation center in the country). All cirrhotic patients (documented clinically or by liver biopsy), who were >18 years old and listed for liver transplantation, were analyzed using a questionnaire that included age, gender, Child-Pugh score, model for end-stage liver diseases (MELD) score, cause of liver cirrhosis, previous surgery, history of previous variceal bleeding and subsequent endoscopic treatment, amount of diuretic use (average use in the previous three months), history of intra-abdominal inflammation, abdominal trauma, oral contraceptive use, and pregnancy. Patients with end-stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, cystic fibrosis, malignancy, pylephlebitis, liver cysts or abscesses, Budd–Chiari syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, vascular abnormalities, or pancreatitis were excluded. Those who had a confirmed diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma by imaging and/or biopsy at the time of listing were also excluded.

All patients consented to participate in the study. At the time of evaluation for transplantation, all candidates were screened by a single expert radiologist with color Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced multi-detector 64-slice dynamic computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation of portal vein patency.

Laboratory studies were performed, including platelet count, alpha-feta protein, albumin levels, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, fasting blood glucose, uric acid, protein C, protein S, antithrombin III, activated protein C resistance (APCR), factor VIII, homocysteine, JAK2 mutation, anticardiolipin antibody, prothrombin gene mutation (G20210A, determined by the Mbol restriction enzyme method), and factor V Leiden mutation (G1691A).

3.1. Statistical Analysis

Results for continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD, and the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for comparison of means between the PVT and non-PVT groups. The chi-square test was used where appropriate for other variables. For all tests, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analysis was performed using SPSS version 17 software.

4. Results

The study included 219 adult cirrhotic patients who met all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. Thirty-five of these patients (15.9%) had PVT.

The characteristics of the patients with PVT compared to the control group are shown in Table 1. Of 219 patients, 71 were female (nine with PVT and 62 without) and 148 were male (26 with PVT and 122 without). The mean age was 46 ± 9.99 years in the patients with PVT and 45 ± 12.71 years in those without PVT. The mean MELD score was 20 ± 6.46 in the PVT group and 19 ± 6.15 in the control group. According to the child classification, 32 patients had child class A cirrhosis (3 with PVT), 107 patients had child class B cirrhosis (20 with PVT), and 80 patients had child class C cirrhosis (12 with PVT). The mean values for serum albumin, platelets, fasting blood sugar, triglycerides, cholesterol, BUN, creatinine, and uric acid were not different between the two groups (Table 1).

Table 1. Mean ± SD for Fasting Blood Glucose, Triglycerides, Cholesterol, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Creatinine, and Uric Acid Levels in Cirrhotic Patients With and Without Portal Vein Thrombosisa
Patients With Portal Vein Thrombosis (n = 35)Patients Without Portal VEIN Thrombosis (n = 184)Significance (2-Tailed)
Gender.433
Male26122
Female962
Age46 ± 9.9945 ± 12.71.756
MELD score20 ± 6.4619 ± 6.15.476
Fasting blood glucose, mg/dl110 ± 42.5110 ± 4.0.96
Triglycerides, mg/dl80 ± 2889 ± 51.287
Cholesterol, mg/dl146 ± 80.5133 ± 50.214
Blood urea nitrogen, mg/dl19.6 ± 10.6219.3 ± 12.52.882
Creatinine, mg/dl1.11 ± 0.441.06 ± 0.44.57
Uric acid, mg/dl5.47 ± 2.374.83 ± 1.87.076
Frequency of hepatitis B11 (31.4)59 (32.06)
Frequency of autoimmune hepatitis7 (20)19 (10.3)

aValues are presented as mean ± SD or No. (%).

The average dose of spironolactone and furosemide taken by each patient in the previous three months was analyzed, and there was no statistically significant difference in the doses of these diuretics between the two groups. Of the 219 participants, 102 consumed both spironolactone and furosemide, while 54 used only one and 63 used neither. There was no statistically significant difference in PVT prevalence between these three groups (P = 0.338, 0.329, and 0.143, respectively).

The mean alpha-feta protein level was 34.04 µg/L in the PVT group (SD: 144.96), and 19.66 µg/L in the non-PVT group (SD: 102.72). The difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.481).

Among the female patients, six with PVT and 18 without PVT had used oral contraceptives for some months. There was no statistically significant difference between these two groups (P = 0.152).

The causes of cirrhosis in the participants were analyzed, and the most common etiology was hepatitis B (Table 1). There was no difference in patients with or without PVT in the etiology of cirrhosis. The presence or absence of previous surgery was also not different between the PVT and non-PVT groups (P = 0.327).

Among the 219 participants, variceal bleeding was detected in 62, and 16 of these patients had PVT. A history of variceal bleeding was more frequent in patients with PVT than in those without it, and this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.023, OR: 2.526, 95% CI: 1.200 - 5.317). However, the duration of variceal bleeding had no association with PVT. Since sclerotherapy with 50% alcohol was performed on only eight patients and all others received rubber-band ligation alone, a comparison between these two modalities was not meaningful in this study.

No patient in this study received a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), shunt surgery, or cyanoacrylate injection. A history of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was present in four patients with PVT and 15 without PVT, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.516). There was no significant difference in history of abdominal trauma between the patients with and without PVT (P = 1.000). The same was true for histories of diabetes mellitus and ischemic heart disease (P = 0.437 and 0.415, respectively). There was no family history of thrombosis in any of our patients.

The presence or absence of ascites was assessed with sonography and CT. Of the 219 participants, ascites was observed in 118 patients by the former method and in 106 by the latter. The patients were divided into four groups based on the amount of ascitic fluid: none, mild, moderate, and severe. The amount of ascites was analyzed in two ways. First, it was compared between patients with various amounts of fluid on both sonography and CT scan, and second, the prevalence was compared between patients with moderate or severe ascites and those with mild or no ascites. No statistically significant difference was seen between the groups.

The levels of homocysteine, protein C, protein S, antithrombin III, APCR, factor VIII, and anticardiolipin antibodies showed no significant differences between the patients with PVT and the control group (P = 0.545, 0.625, 0.282, 0.678, 0.478, 0.479, and 0.481, respectively) (Figure 1).

Comparison of Procoagulant and Anticoagulant Factors in Cirrhotic Patients With and Without Portal Vein Thrombosis
Figure 1. Comparison of Procoagulant and Anticoagulant Factors in Cirrhotic Patients With and Without Portal Vein Thrombosis

Factor V Leiden polymorphism (G1691A) was compared between the PVT and non-PVT groups. Heterozygosity for G1691A polymorphism was detected in one patient with PVT and in six without PVT. No statistically significant difference was noted (P = 0.999). Prothrombin gene mutation and JAK2 mutation were totally absent among our patients.

5. Discussion

PVT is a common complication of end-stage liver disease in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation. The overall prevalence of PVT in our study of cirrhotic patients was 15.9%, which was comparable to the prevalence of 8% - 25% reported in other studies of patients awaiting liver transplantation (4, 12, 14, 15). In studies that included patients with less severe disease, or that used sonography alone for the diagnosis of PVT, the prevalence of PVT was as low as 0.6% (3).

Despite bleeding tendencies in cirrhotic patients, mostly related to low platelet counts and high prothrombin times, this condition is now considered a hypercoagulable state (16, 17). Enhanced thrombin generation associated with low levels of protein C and elevated factor VIII has been implicated (18-20). However, it is not clear whether this is a genetic-based abnormality or is simply related to the consequences of synthetic dysfunction in cirrhotic patients. In this prospective study, we analyzed various predisposing factors for PVT in cirrhotic patients who were awaiting liver transplantation. There was no association between known hypercoagulable states and PVT in our study. (Figure 1) This is in contrast to some previous studies that reported thrombophilic risk factors in relationship to the prevalence of PVT in cirrhotic patients. Positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies, including anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant (10), as well as prothrombin gene mutation 20210A (21), the C677>T substitution in the methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase gene (a mutation that causes increased plasma levels of homocysteine), and factor V Leiden mutation, have been reported to be related to PVT (22). In our study, the levels of homocysteine, protein C, protein S, antithrombin III, APCR, factor VIII, and anticardiolipin antibodies in the cirrhotic patients were not associated with development of PVT. Furthermore, we did not find any prothrombin gene mutations in our 219 cirrhotic patients. This may be related to our strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as to the fact that overall, it is the imbalance between procoagulants and anticoagulants that causes the hypercoagulable state of cirrhosis, rather than a single factor (17, 23).

A number of previous studies have found that the etiology of cirrhosis may influence the prevalence of PVT in patients, with the highest PVT incidence occurring in alcoholic and hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis (24, 25). We did not find such a relationship in our study. This might be due to the high rate of hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis in both groups.

In our study, only endoscopic therapy for esophageal varices (with sclerotherapy or variceal band ligation) increased the risk of PVT, but the frequency of episodes of variceal bleeding had no association with PVT. Consistent with our results, in one study of 251 cirrhotic patients awaiting transplantation, a multivariate analysis showed that a past history of variceal bleeding was a predictive factor for thrombosis (4). Episodes of variceal bleeding, reflecting the severity of portal hypertension, are more likely to be predisposing factors for, rather than a consequence of, PVT (4, 26). Other studies showed that endoscopic sclerotherapy for esophageal varices may represent a trigger factor for PVT in cirrhotic patients with genetic thrombophilia (21). In one study by Tripodi et al. the theoretical risk with cyanoacrylate glue was higher than with sclerotherapy; however, the existing evidence comes from case reports of small studies (17). Some recent studies have shown associations between thrombopoietin receptor agonists and the development of PVT in cirrhotic patients (27). The role of sclerotherapy is still controversial. Since esophageal variceal bleeding is an indicator of severe portal hypertension, further prospective studies should be done to evaluate the causative role of endoscopic treatment for varices in PVT. Alternatively, sluggish blood flow due to collateral formation might have a role in the development of PVT (7).

Ascites at baseline and worsening renal function have been related to new-onset PVT in patients with cirrhosis who are on waiting lists for transplantation (28). In our study, we could not confirm this association.

Our study had several limitations. Although we performed this study in a prospective manner, we evaluated our patients only upon their addition to the waiting list, and we did not follow them to determine whether they developed PVT later. We also did not study the patients’ fibrinolytic profiles, which have been recently reported to be associated with an increased risk of PVT in patients with cirrhosis (29).

In conclusion, in this study of cirrhotic patients on the waiting list for transplantation, PVT was common and was associated with previous episodes of variceal bleeding. We did not find any correlation between hypercoagulable disorders and the development of PVT.

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Kinjo N, Kawanaka H, Akahoshi T, Matsumoto Y, Kamori M, Nagao Y, et al. Portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis. World J Hepatol. 2014; 6(2) : 64 -71 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 2.

    Qi X, Han G, Fan D. Management of portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 11(7) : 435 -46 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 3.

    Okuda K, Ohnishi K, Kimura K, Matsutani S, Sumida M, Goto N, et al. Incidence of portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis. An angiographic study in 708 patients. Gastroenterology. 1985; 89(2) : 279 -86 [PubMed]

  • 4.

    Francoz C, Belghiti J, Vilgrain V, Sommacale D, Paradis V, Condat B, et al. Splanchnic vein thrombosis in candidates for liver transplantation: usefulness of screening and anticoagulation. Gut. 2005; 54(5) : 691 -7 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 5.

    Martinelli I, Primignani M, Aghemo A, Reati R, Bucciarelli P, Fabris F, et al. High levels of factor VIII and risk of extra-hepatic portal vein obstruction. J Hepatol. 2009; 50(5) : 916 -22 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 6.

    Chen H, Trilok G, Wang F, Qi X, Xiao J, Yang C. A single hospital study on portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients - clinical characteristics & risk factors. Indian J Med Res. 2014; 139(2) : 260 -6 [PubMed]

  • 7.

    Maruyama H, Okugawa H, Takahashi M, Yokosuka O. De novo portal vein thrombosis in virus-related cirrhosis: predictive factors and long-term outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108(4) : 568 -74 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 8.

    Kakaei F, Nikeghbalian S, Salahi H, Bahador A, Kazemi K, Dehghani M, et al. Liver transplantation in the presence of old portal vein thrombosis. Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2010; 1(1) : 44 -8 [PubMed]

  • 9.

    Malek-Hosseini SA, Mehdizadeh AR, Salahi H, Saberi-Firouzi M, Bagheri-Lankarani K, Bahador A, et al. Results of liver transplantation: analysis of 140 cases at a single center. Transplant Proc. 2005; 37(7) : 3157 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 10.

    Qi X, Zhang C, Han G, Zhang W, He C, Yin Z, et al. Prevalence of the JAK2V617F mutation in Chinese patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis: a prospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 27(6) : 1036 -43 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 11.

    Primignani M. Portal vein thrombosis, revisited. Dig Liver Dis. 2010; 42(3) : 163 -70 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 12.

    Mangia A, Villani MR, Cappucci G, Santoro R, Ricciardi R, Facciorusso D, et al. Causes of portal venous thrombosis in cirrhotic patients: the role of genetic and acquired factors. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005; 17(7) : 745 -51 [PubMed]

  • 13.

    D'Amico M, Pasta L, Sammarco P. MTHFR C677TT, PAI1 4G-4G, V Leiden Q506, and prothrombin G20210A in hepatocellular carcinoma with and without portal vein thrombosis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2009; 28(1) : 70 -3 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 14.

    Rodriguez-Castro KI, Porte RJ, Nadal E, Germani G, Burra P, Senzolo M. Management of nonneoplastic portal vein thrombosis in the setting of liver transplantation: a systematic review. Transplantation. 2012; 94(11) : 1145 -53 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 15.

    Gayowski TJ, Marino IR, Doyle HR, Echeverri L, Mieles L, Todo S, et al. A high incidence of native portal vein thrombosis in veterans undergoing liver transplantation. J Surg Res. 1996; 60(2) : 333 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 16.

    Thalheimer U, Triantos CK, Samonakis DN, Patch D, Burroughs AK. Infection, coagulation, and variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Gut. 2005; 54(4) : 556 -63 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 17.

    Tripodi A, Anstee QM, Sogaard KK, Primignani M, Valla DC. Hypercoagulability in cirrhosis: causes and consequences. J Thromb Haemost. 2011; 9(9) : 1713 -23 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 18.

    Gatt A, Riddell A, Calvaruso V, Tuddenham EG, Makris M, Burroughs AK. Enhanced thrombin generation in patients with cirrhosis-induced coagulopathy. J Thromb Haemost. 2010; 8(9) : 1994 -2000 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 19.

    Tripodi A, Primignani M, Lemma L, Chantarangkul V, Mannucci PM. Evidence that low protein C contributes to the procoagulant imbalance in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2013; 59(2) : 265 -70 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 20.

    Tripodi A, Primignani M, Lemma L, Chantarangkul V, Dell'Era A, Iannuzzi F, et al. Detection of the imbalance of procoagulant versus anticoagulant factors in cirrhosis by a simple laboratory method. Hepatology. 2010; 52(1) : 249 -55 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 21.

    Amitrano L, Brancaccio V, Guardascione MA, Margaglione M, Sacco M, Martino R, et al. Portal vein thrombosis after variceal endoscopic sclerotherapy in cirrhotic patients: role of genetic thrombophilia. Endoscopy. 2002; 34(7) : 535 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 22.

    Li XM, Wei YF, Hao HL, Hao YB, He LS, Li JD, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia and the MTHFR C677T mutation in Budd-Chiari syndrome. Am J Hematol. 2002; 71(1) : 11 -4 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 23.

    Tripodi A, Primignani M, Chantarangkul V, Dell'Era A, Clerici M, de Franchis R, et al. An imbalance of pro- vs anti-coagulation factors in plasma from patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2009; 137(6) : 2105 -11 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 24.

    Nonami T, Yokoyama I, Iwatsuki S, Starzl TE. The incidence of portal vein thrombosis at liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1992; 16(5) : 1195 -8 [PubMed]

  • 25.

    Lertpipopmetha K, Auewarakul CU. High incidence of hepatitis B infection-associated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in the Southeast Asian patients with portal vein thrombosis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011; 11 : 66 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 26.

    Sarfeh IJ. Portal vein thrombosis associated with cirrhosis: clinical importance. Arch Surg. 1979; 114(8) : 902 -5 [PubMed]

  • 27.

    Dultz G, Kronenberger B, Azizi A, Mihm U, Vogl TJ, Sarrazin U, et al. Portal vein thrombosis as complication of romiplostim treatment in a cirrhotic patient with hepatitis C-associated immune thrombocytopenic purpura. J Hepatol. 2011; 55(1) : 229 -32 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 28.

    John BV, Konjeti R, Aggarwal A, Lopez R, Atreja A, Miller C, et al. Impact of untreated portal vein thrombosis on pre and post liver transplant outcomes in cirrhosis. Ann Hepatol. 2013; 12(6) : 952 -8 [PubMed]

  • 29.

    Rossetto V, Spiezia L, Senzolo M, Rodriguez-Castro KI, Gavasso S, Woodhams B, et al. Does decreased fibrinolysis have a role to play in the development of non-neoplastic portal vein thrombosis in patients with hepatic cirrhosis? Intern Emerg Med. 2014; 9(4) : 397 -403 [DOI][PubMed]

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: