IF: 1.578
Cite Score:
1.45
THOMSON REUTERS - SCOPUS

Hepatitis C Virus - Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Direct - Acting Antiviral Agents

AUTHORS

Xu Liu 1 , Yanhang Gao 1 , ** , Junqi Niu 1 , *

AUTHORS INFORMATION

1 Department of Hepatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China

Corresponding Authors:

How to Cite: Liu X, Gao Y, Niu J. Hepatitis C Virus - Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Direct - Acting Antiviral Agents, Hepat Mon. 2018 ; 18(6):e66007. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.66007.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Hepatitis Monthly: 18 (6); e66007
Published Online: April 28, 2018
Article Type: Review Article
Received: January 8, 2018
Revised: March 21, 2018
Accepted: March 26, 2018
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Context: The emergence of direct - acting antiviral agents (DAAs) with high sustained virological responses (SVR) is an epoch - making revolution. However, the value of antiviral agents in the field of hepatitis C - related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not clear. Further, the risk of tumor occurrence or recurrence following an antiviral regimen is not yet reached a consensus.

Evidence Acquisition: All scientific evidence was collected through a systematic review of studies discussing DAA regimen and hepatitis C-related HCC, in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. The relevant articles were obtained and reviewed carefully before working on the paper.

Results: The current review study aimed at discussing recent studies on hepatitis C - related HCC in the era of DAAs, including application of DAAs in the field of treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV), efficacy of DAAs on HCV-associated HCC, and the effect of DAAs on occurrence and recurrence of HCC.

Conclusions: It was shown that DAAs had a relatively poor therapeutic effect on HCV patients with HCC, based on the current studies. After analyzing the existing data, the conclusion cannot yet be reached that DAA treatment influences the risk of HCC in patients with HCV infection.

Keywords

Direct - Acting Antiviral Agents Hepatocellular Carcinoma Hepatitis C Virus Review

Copyright © 2018, Hepatitis Monthly. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Context

According to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) statistics, 71 million people worldwide have chronic hepatitis C (CHC) (1), and approximately 60% - 80% of the patients with hepatitis C are in a state of continuous viral infection (2). Due to the biological characteristics of HCV, host immune - function differences, and other factors, HCV has a higher risk of cirrhosis (3) and hepatocellular carcinoma HCC (4). Studies showed that HCV infection causes a 15- to 20 - fold increase in the risk of developing HCC. The incidence of HCC is 3% - 5% per year in the HCV population with cirrhosis (5). Among HCV - infected individuals, Asian patients (primarily Southeast Asian) are older, have lower body mass index (BMI) values, and are more likely to be in advanced liver diseases with a greater chance of progression to HCC in the event of cirrhosis (6, 7). In the United States, approximately 50% - 60% of the patients with HCC have chronic infection of HCV (8, 9), whereas in China, HCC is mainly caused by infection of hepatitis B virus (HBV). Authors’ previous study showed that seroprevalence of anti - HCV antibodies was approximately 16% (10). The mortality of HCC in the United States increased by 72% from 2003 to 2012 (11), and the main cause of carcinoma was long-term HCV infection (12-14). At present, the number of patients with viral hepatitis - related HCC in China is large; however, with the popularization of HBV vaccine and the success of mother - infant blockage, the composition of the etiology of HCC changes. The field of HCV - related HCC is of increasing concern, and antiviral treatments are the key to HCV - related liver diseases.

Since 2011, oral direct - acting antiviral regimens gradually replaced the traditional interferon (IFN) and had a cure rate as high as 90% or more (15). Prior to this, due to the poor efficacy and contraindications of IFN, anti - HCV treatment in patients with HCC was relatively rare. Recently, with the wide - spread use of direct - acting antiviral agents (DAAs), more and more patients with HCC infected with HCV are trying to continue antiviral therapy with DAAs after receiving standard anti - tumor therapy. However, the efficacy needs to be fully evaluated. In addition, there are different opinions about the effect of DAAs on the incidence of HCC in patients with CHC, especially on the recurrence rate of HCC in patients successfully cured. A considerable number of scholars believe that DAAs may increase the occurrence or recurrence of HCV - related HCC, which is a potentially significant clinical problem. Therefore, the current review study aimed at focusing on the following two research hotspots: the antiviral efficacy of DAAs in CHC patients with HCC and the effect of DAAs on the incidence or recurrence of HCV-related HCC.

2. Evidence Acquisition

To gather data and information for the current review, authors systematically searched for relevant articles that described the relationship between DAAs and HCV - related HCC, in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science with date limitation (within 10 years). Free text words and MeSH terms were used along with Boolean operators such as the following keywords in the search: hepatitis C, viral hepatitis, viral liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, HCV - associated HCC, hepatitis C - related HCC, direct - acting antiviral agents, DAA, etc. A review of the title and abstract of studies identified in the search was performed to exclude studies that did not answer the research question of interest. Full texts of the rest of the articles were then examined to determine whether they contained the sought data. After browsing the full texts, clinical studies were included in the current review study except for the ones with the following conditions: 1) non - English articles; 2) studies on liver diseases other than hepatitis C; 3) HCC that occurred not based on HCV; 4) studies on antiviral treatments other than DAAs.

3. Results

3.1. Application of DAAs in the Field of HCV Treatment

The pharmacological mechanism of traditional IFN is that IFN binds its receptors to the cell membrane, turning on a signaling pathway that activates transcription factors called IFN regulatory factors, which induce the host to produce IFN - stimulated gene (ISG) products and inhibit the virus. Proteases, helicases, and RNA polymerases are non - structural proteins that are targets for DAAs. However, due to the rapid development of resistance mutations in HCV to a single drug, monotherapy cannot be used to treat HCV.

Effective antiviral therapy allows patients to achieve sustained virological responses (SVR), which can reduce the incidence of HCV - related complications, liver transplantation, and even death (16, 17). The partial response (PR) regimen of peginterferon - α (PegIFN - α) combined with ribavirin (RBV) used to be the standard of care for HCV (18). The SVR rate of patients in China with HCV treated by the PR regimen ranged 44% to 83% (19). However, the standard course of this regimen was relatively long, had significant side effects, and was better to treat non - genotype 1 HCV; whereas, genotype 1b infection was predominant in Chinese patients (20). In addition, antiviral therapy with IFN had a high recurrence rate (approximately 30%) (21). When non - responders with genotype 1 were re - administered a high-dose PR regimen, the SVR rate was less than 18% (22).

DAAs are small - molecule compounds for therapies targeting viral proteins in the life cycle of HCV. The first NS3/4A serine protease inhibitor was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2011, and a total of 10 drugs were approved from 2011 to 2016. Daclatasvir (DCV) combined with asunaprevir (ASV) was the first DAA regimen approved by China in 2017 to treat genotype 1b CHC (non - cirrhosis or compensated cirrhosis) among adults. The emergence of DAAs is a revolutionary breakthrough that effectively eradicates HCV in a short period of time, typically 12 weeks, with a high SVR rate (7, 23-25). Further, DCV in combination with sofosbuvir (SOF) improved the efficacy of monotherapy; it was also highly recommended by the European Association for the Study of The Liver (EASL) in 2015 to treat all genotypes of HCV infection.

3.2. Efficacy of DAAs on HCV - associated HCC

It is demonstrated that treatment with IFN in CHC patients with HCC brought about survival benefit (26-28), presumably because IFN inhibited the pro - inflammatory and carcinogenic effects of HCV through anti - inflammatory, anti - angiogenic, and antiviral functions. However, a lower SVR rate and certain side effects limited the use of IFN, and patients with decompensated cirrhosis could not use IFN for antiviral therapy (21). Nowadays, the approval of oral DAAs regimens extends the clinical treatment of HCV to HCV - related cirrhosis with HCC. However, until now, the data on the efficacy of DAAs in patients with HCV - related HCC are limited. Over the past two years, related studies appeared in China and other countries.

In the area of DAA therapy for HCV - associated HCC with or without cirrhosis, Chang et al., published a cohort of Asian - American patients (N = 110) in 2017 showing that an overall SVR12, defined as having no detectable HCV RNA upon polymerase chain reaction (PCR) 12 weeks following the end of treatment, was as high as 93% after an IFN - free SOF - based regimen compared with only 82% in 17 patients with HCC (29). Coincidentally, in the study by Prenner et al., a total of 421 CHC patients with cirrhosis were identified, of whom 33% had active HCC or a history of HCC. The team found that after DAA therapy, CHC patients without HCC had an SVR of 88% compared with 79% in the ones with HCC; the differences were statistically significant. Of the patients with HCC who did not achieve SVR, 93% had an active tumor. DAA therapy achieved a significant SVR rate in the presence of an inactive tumor or after removal of tumor, similar to the patients without HCC. After multivariate analysis, the primary predictor of failure for DAAs was the initial presence of active HCC (30).

Recent studies showed that the effect of DAA therapy on HCV - related HCC can be corrected by liver transplantation (LT). The report by Beste et al., published in the Journal of Hepatology supported this point of view. Of 17,487 HCV - treatment recipients, 624 had prior HCC, including 142 who underwent LT (HCC/LT) and 482 with no LT (HCC/NLT). The results showed that overall SVR was up to 91.9% in CHC patients without HCC and 93.4% in HCC/LT, but only 74.5% in HCC/NLT after DAA therapy. For different genotypes of HCV, efficacy of DAAs is different. In patients with HCC, the highest SVR (HCC/NLT 79.0% vs. HCC/LT 96.0%) was obtained for genotype 1 and the lowest for genotype 3 (HCC/NLT 47.0% vs. HCC/LT 88.9 %) (31, 32).

It is not yet clear why HCV - related HCC had lower SVR rates compared with CHC without HCC when the selected studies were analyzed. Presumably, the presence of a tumor induces the long - term inflammatory response, which leads to the disruption of normal liver structure and alters the microenvironment of cytokines and chemokines (33, 34); thus, affecting the process of the intrahepatic immune response. In addition, patients with HCC are mostly at the cirrhosis stage, and the burden of advanced liver disease increases the difficulty of antiviral therapy. By contrast, LT corrects disorders of liver function and removes potential tumor cells, thus achieving high SVR in patients with HCC after transplantation. Patients with LT generally have a strong desire for survival and good compliance; therefore, they may better comply with antiviral therapy (35, 36). Based on the current study results, it was demonstrated that DAAs had a relatively poor therapeutic effect on HCV - associated HCC.

3.3. Effect of DAAs on Occurrence and Recurrence of HCV - associated HCC

The availability of highly effective, oral antiviral regimens, which gradually replaced IFN - based antiviral therapies, changed the treatment options for patients with CHC. Most of these patients are fortunate enough to achieve virus clearance; however, clearance does not represent a cure for CHC - associated liver disease. In addition, studies showed that HCV RNA persists in the liver and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in some sustained viral responders (37). Patients with cirrhosis after HCV clearance still require comprehensive treatment to delay the progression and complications of cirrhosis. As a matter of fact, it can be observed that the benefits of virus removal increases patients’ survival rate and avoids complications. For the clinical application of new DAAs, more time is needed to observe their safety and their correlation with the occurrence or recurrence of HCC. Initially, some scholars believed that the DAA therapy for patients with HCV infection can reduce the risk of HCC, but there were also many studies emphasizing the use of DAAs in patients with decompensated cirrhosis after viral clearance in which the occurrence or recurrence of liver cancer may increase, resulting in queries on such treatments (38). Previously, due to the immunostimulatory and anti - tumor effects of IFN, this phenomenon was never observed in IFN - based HCV treatment.

3.3.1. “De novo HCC” in DAA - treated Patients

Several studies discussed DAAs and de novo HCC, the individual study details are outlined in Table 1. An uncontrolled study from the United States followed the outcomes of 66 patients with cirrhosis who achieved an SVR using DAA therapy. Ravi et al., observed an occurrence of de novo HCC in about 9% of the patients during or within six months of DAA therapy (39). DAA therapy seemed to increase the de novo occurrence of HCC among patients with HCV - related cirrhosis (40). However, other studies showed opposite conclusion (41-43). For example, Li DK et al., performed a retrospective population - based cohort of 17,836 individuals; the results showed that DAA therapy was not associated with a higher risk of HCC in cirrhotics with CHC in the short - term (44). Ioannou et al., reported, after analyzing the association between SVR and HCC risk and between the type of antiviral regimen and HCC risk by the Cox proportional hazards, that DAA - induced SVR was associated with a 71% reduction in HCC risk, and treatment with DAAs was not associated with increased HCC risk compared with the treatment with IFN (45). Cheung et al., from Queen Mary University of London, found that nearly one - third of the newly detected liver cancers developed in patients occurred early, within three months of commencing DAA treatment, suggesting it as an event of cancers that were radiologically undetectable at treatment baseline rather than de novo development, in other words, rather than induced by drugs (46).

Table 1. Summary of Studies on HCC Occurrence after HCV Treatment with DAAs
StudyCountryStudy TypePatientsa, NAgeMale (%)Liver Cirrhosis (%)DAA RegimenSVR (%) for DAAsMedian Follow - up (Years)HCC (%)Risk of HCC
Ravi, 2017 (39)AmericaRetrospective666062100.0SOF/LDV92.00.59.1High
Conti, 2016 (47)ItalyRetrospective, Prospective2856360100.0SOF/SMV/DCV /LDV/3D ± RBV100.00.73.2Unrelated
Rinaldi, 2016 (48)ItalyProspective2806853100.0SOF/SIM/DCV /LDV/3D ± RBV97.10.33.2Unrelated
Li, 2017 (44)AmericaRetrospective5834629719.9SOF/SMV/DCV /LDV/3D ± RBV96.21.10.9Unrelated
Cheung, 2016 (46)UKProspective40654---100.0SOF/DCV/LDV ± RBV78.11.35.4Unrelated
Zeng, 2016 (41)ChinaProspective215419100.0SOF/DCV ± RBV95.21.30.0Low
Nagaoki, 2017 (49)JapanProspective154733854.5bDCV/ASV---1.94.5Unrelated
Cardoso, 2016 (40)PortugalRetrospective545970100.0SOF/LDV100.01.07.4High
Kobayashi, 2017 (42)JapanRetrospective77634429.9bDCV/ASV/3D/ telaprevir100.04.02.6Low
Kanwal, 2017 (43)AmericaRetrospective22,500629739.0SOF/SIM/DCV /LDV/3D86.71.01.2Unrelated
Ioannou, 2017 (45)AmericaRetrospective21948619723.8SOF/SIM/DCV /LDV/3D90.76.12Unrelated

Abbreviations: 3D, 3 - drug combination paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir plus dasabuvir; ASV, asunaprevir; DCV, daclatasvir; LDV, ledipasvir; RBV, ribavirin; SIM, simprevir; SMV, simeprevir; SOF, sofosbuvir.

aDAA Treated.

bPercentage for severe fibrosis.

When these previously published studies were consulted, issues were as follows: smaller sample size, shorter follow - up period, and lack of controllability in retrospective cohort studies, which may bias the outcome. Recently, Ji et al., from the Beijing 302 Hospital of China presented a new prospective study at the 52nd EASL (the European Association for the Study of the Liver). A total of 1498 patients were enrolled in the study. After screening for exclusion criteria, 397 patients treated with IFN and 324 patients treated with DAAs were enrolled. The patients were followed for an average of 12 - 36 months. The incidence of HCC did not significantly increase in either group. The study, with the prominent features of a longer follow - up period and more patients aroused heated discussions. Other successively published prospective studies that included tumor occurrence also supported Dr. Ji’s point of view. Nagaoki et al., after a relatively long observation period, showed that carcinoma development after HCV eradication was similar between the patients treated with the PR regimen and DAA therapy (49).

Since approved in 2011, it is believed that DAAs are still generally used for a short time; however, the occurrence of HCC is a long - term and potentially ongoing process. Changes at cellular or molecular levels may occur 1 - 2 years prior to an imaging diagnosis of cancer. After summarizing the main work throughout these researches, it should be clarified that DAA - treated groups were usually confined to the ones with failure of IFN treatment or contraindications for IFN administration such as decompensated liver cirrhosis. While initial liver diseases were more serious and risks of developing cirrhosis were higher in such population, they had a higher risk of HCC occurrence, possibly leading to bias of results that could interfere with discussions of the effects of DAAs on HCC. Therefore, as proven by previous studies, there is ample body of evidence now that the risk for de novo HCC development in successfully treated cirrhotic patients is not increased, when data are properly adjusted to the stage of disease.

3.3.2. “HCC Recurrence” in DAA - treated Patients

Although the risk of HCC after a DAA regimen is of great concern, some scholars considered that this risk is primarily aimed at patients with a previous HCC (50). In other words, DAA may have an influence on tumor recurrence. Relevant studies are summarized in Table 2. Reig et al., published a retrospective cohort with small sample size (N = 58) (51); 58 patients with prior carcinoma meeting the inclusion criteria received DAAs. After a median follow - up of 5.7 months, three patients died and 16 developed radiologic tumor recurrence (27.6%). The data showed an unexpectedly high rate and pattern of tumor recurrence coinciding with HCV clearance. Other studies (52, 53), with similar results, held the shared view that patients receiving DAAs had a greater risk for the recurrence of HCC. Conti et al., also found that after DAA therapy, 17 of 59 (28.8%) patients had HCC recurrence, whereas only nine of 285 (3.16%) patients were diagnosed with HCC for the first time (47). Scholars emphasized on the issue that DAA therapy may increase the recurrence of tumors and speculated that in the process of eliminating HCV, DAAs may induce the tumor by changing the immune status of the host. It is well - known that CHC activates an intrahepatic immune response, leading to increased expression of ISGs and activation of natural killer cells, the most prevalent innate immune cell in the liver. After the DAA therapy, with the clearance of HCV followed by the retreat of immune surveillance, C - X - C motif chemokine (CXCL) 10, CXCL11 decreased, and vascular endothelial growth factor increased significantly, which supported tumor development (54), contributing to the proliferation of isolated tumor cells (55). Therefore, it is suggested that rapid changes to the immune surveillance system and/or anti - tumor response following DAA therapy could be a reason for the apparent increase in HCC recurrence.

Table 2. Summary of Studies on HCC Recurrence after HCV Treatment with DAAs
StudyCountryStudy TypePatientsa, NAgeMale (%)DAA RegimenSVR for DAAs (%)Median Follow - up (Years)HCC (%)Risk of HCC
El Kassas, 2017 (53)EgyptProspective535735SOF/SIM/DCV /LDV ± RBV77·41.337.7High
Huang, 2018 (56)AmericaRetrospective626346-98.42.647.0Unrelated
Reig, 2016 (51)SpainProspective586669SOF/SMV/DCV/ LDV/3D ± RBV91.40.527.6High
Yang, 2016 (52)AmericaProspective18--SOF/telaprevir, ± RBV ± IFN--27.8High
Conti, 2016 (47)ItalyRetrospective Prospective596568SOF/SMV/DCV /LDV/3D ± RBV89.80.724.6High
Pol, 2016 (57)FranceProspective1896278SOF/SMV/DCV /LDV/3D ± RBV±IFN78.32.012.7Unrelated
Pol, 2016 (57)FranceProspective3146182SOF/SMV/DCV /LDV/3D± RBV ± IFN80.01.02.2low
Pol, 2016 (57)FranceProspective136463SOF/SMV/DCV /LDV/3D ± RBV±IFN100.01.87.7Unrelated
Cabibbo, 2017 (58)ItalyProspective1437086SOF/SIM/DCV /LDV/3D ± RBV96.00.816.8Unrelated
Ikeda, 2017 (59)JapanRetrospective1777160SOF /DCV /LDV /ASV/3D ± RBV89.61.734.5low
Minami, 2016 (60)JapanRetrospective267167SOF /DCV /LDV /ASV ± RBV84.61.330.8Unrelated
Torres, 2016 (61)AmericaProspective86488SOF/SIM/LDV /3D ± RBV100.01.60Unrelated
Zavaglia, 2016 (62)ItalyProspective316565SOF/SIM/DCV /LDV/3D ± RBV100.02.33.2Unrelated
Rinaldi, 2016 (48)ItalyProspective156853SOF/SIM/DCV/ LDV/3D ± RBV100.00.36.7Unrelated

Abbreviations: 3D, 3 - drug combination paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir plus dasabuvir; ASV, asunaprevir; DCV, daclatasvir; LDV, ledipasvir; RBV, ribavirin; SIM, simprevir; SMV, simeprevir; SOF, sofosbuvir.

aDAA Treated.

Contrarily, the French National Agency for Research on AIDS (ANRS) collaborative study group analyzed individual data from three French prospective multicenter ANRS cohorts and concluded that there was currently no evidence to suggest that DAAs may increase the risk of HCC recurrence (57). A prospective multicenter study by Cabibbo et al., (58) and a retrospective cohort by Huang et al., (56) also showed the risk of HCC recurrence was not higher than that of observed in DAA - unexposed patients. Ikeda et al., even suggested that DAA therapy significantly decreased recurrence rate after adjustment with covariates of tumor multiplicity, alpha - fetoprotein (AFP) value, and prothrombin time on the basis of a multivariate analysis (59). Further, there was a significant decrease in AFP in patients with cirrhosis achieving a SVR with DAAs. Maybe AFP should be further studied as a screening modality for HCC in patients with HCV - related cirrhosis achieving SVR (63). To solve the inconsistency in the findings and increase the statistical power, a statistical analysis of a large collection of research results from individual studies could be more useful. A systematic review published in 2017 provided this summary. A total of 41 studies were included. In a meta - regression adjusting for study follow-up and age, DAA therapy was not associated with higher HCC incidence, and there was no evidence to show differences between DAA and IFN therapy on HCC occurrence or recurrence (64).

Combined with the current researches (48, 60-62), the conclusion that DAAs may increase the risk for early HCC recurrence still needs more large - scale data and prospective studies to confirm. Therefore, the relevant research in the future should consider the following: a large enough sample size, a long follow - up, a prospective study design, and the same baseline. Among them, the most important one is the consistency of disease background in all groups. Since the patients treated with DAAs may be different from the ones using IFN, controlled studies with sufficient sample size are necessary to shed light on this controversial issue. It is noteworthy that due to the current decreasing use of IFN, observational studies using IFN as a control group are no longer easy to conduct. Only the available data can be used as a control. Choosing HCV patients as a study population and ruling out the status of advanced liver disease may prevent the disease itself from affecting the results. Additionally, since withholding DAA therapy in patients with advanced liver disease and HCC may have negative consequences, including a higher risk of decompensation and death, studies on DAA regimen should consider the competing risks of death due to HCC recurrence and decompensated cirrhosis (56). The effects of DAAs on hepatocarcinogenesis, tumor progression, and metastasis should be further studied to fully explain these unexpected clinical observations.

4. Conclusions

With the advent of DAAs, viruses can be efficiently removed and SVR can be achieved in most patients. However, compared with acute HCV infection, DAAs are less effective when treating CHC patients with HCC. In addition, whether DAA could induce the occurrence or recurrence of HCC in the treatment of HCV is a controversy in China and other countries. After analyzing the existing studies, it cannot yet be concluded that DAA therapy influences the risk of HCV - related HCC, although some prospective studies with larger - scale data indicated that the incidence of HCC did not increase significantly after DAA therapy. Therefore, more prospective studies with homogeneous baseline are still needed to determine the impact of DAA on the occurrence or recurrence of HCC.

Footnote

References

  • 1. World Health Organization. Hepatitis C Fact sheets. [cited October]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs164/en/.
  • 2. Cortez KJ, Kottilil S. Beyond interferon: rationale and prospects for newer treatment paradigms for chronic hepatitis C. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2015;6(1):4-14. doi: 10.1177/2040622314551934. [PubMed: 25553238].
  • 3. Freeman AJ, Dore GJ, Law MG, Thorpe M, Von Overbeck J, Lloyd AR, et al. Estimating progression to cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology. 2001;34(4 Pt 1):809-16. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.27831. [PubMed: 11584380].
  • 4. El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(7):2557-76. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.061. [PubMed: 17570226].
  • 5. Zamor PJ, deLemos AS, Russo MW. Viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma: etiology and management. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017;8(2):229-42. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.03.14. [PubMed: 28480063].
  • 6. Nguyen LH, Nguyen MH. Systematic review: Asian patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37(10):921-36. doi: 10.1111/apt.12300. [PubMed: 23557103].
  • 7. Nguyen MH, Whittemore AS, Garcia RT, Tawfeek SA, Ning J, Lam S, et al. Role of ethnicity in risk for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C and cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2(9):820-4. [PubMed: 15354283].
  • 8. El-Serag HB, Kanwal F. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States: where are we? Where do we go? Hepatology. 2014;60(5):1767-75. doi: 10.1002/hep.27222. [PubMed: 24839253].
  • 9. Perz JF, Armstrong GL, Farrington LA, Hutin YJ, Bell BP. The contributions of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections to cirrhosis and primary liver cancer worldwide. J Hepatol. 2006;45(4):529-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.05.013. [PubMed: 16879891].
  • 10. Li H. Retrospective analysis of the clinical features of 876 cases of patients with primary liver cancer. Jilin: Jilin University; 2016.
  • 11. Ryerson AB, Eheman CR, Altekruse SF, Ward JW, Jemal A, Sherman RL, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2012, featuring the increasing incidence of liver cancer. Cancer. 2016;122(9):1312-37. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29936. [PubMed: 26959385].
  • 12. Hajarizadeh B, Grebely J, Dore GJ. Epidemiology and natural history of HCV infection. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(9):553-62. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.107. [PubMed: 23817321].
  • 13. Beste LA, Leipertz SL, Green PK, Dominitz JA, Ross D, Ioannou GN. Trends in burden of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma by underlying liver disease in US veterans, 2001-2013. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(6):1471-82. quiz e17-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.056. [PubMed: 26255044].
  • 14. El-Serag HB, Mason AC. Risk factors for the rising rates of primary liver cancer in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(21):3227-30. [PubMed: 11088082].
  • 15. Pawlotsky JM, Feld JJ, Zeuzem S, Hoofnagle JH. From non-A, non-B hepatitis to hepatitis C virus cure. J Hepatol. 2015;62(1 Suppl):S87-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.02.006. [PubMed: 25920094].
  • 16. Backus LI, Boothroyd DB, Phillips BR, Belperio P, Halloran J, Mole LA. A sustained virologic response reduces risk of all-cause mortality in patients with hepatitis C. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(6):509-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.03.004. [PubMed: 21397729].
  • 17. Van der Meer AJ, Veldt BJ, Feld JJ, Wedemeyer H, Dufour JF, Lammert F, et al. Association between sustained virological response and all-cause mortality among patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced hepatic fibrosis. JAMA. 2012;308(24):2584-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.144878. [PubMed: 23268517].
  • 18. Hu P, Ren H. [Current status of treatment of chronic hepatitis C and related challenges in the "Pre-DAA Era" in China]. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2016;24(11):869-73. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2016.11.015. [PubMed: 27978936].
  • 19. Xiaoyu W, Junqi N. Mechanism of action of direct-acting antiviral agents in treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Linchuang Gandanbing Zazhi. 2016;32(9):1699-705.
  • 20. Messina JP, Humphreys I, Flaxman A, Brown A, Cooke GS, Pybus OG, et al. Global distribution and prevalence of hepatitis C virus genotypes. Hepatology. 2015;61(1):77-87. doi: 10.1002/hep.27259. [PubMed: 25069599].
  • 21. McHutchison JG, Lawitz EJ, Shiffman ML, Muir AJ, Galler GW, McCone J, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2b or alfa-2a with ribavirin for treatment of hepatitis C infection. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(6):580-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808010. [PubMed: 19625712].
  • 22. Singal AG, Waljee AK, Shiffman M, Bacon BR, Schoenfeld PS. Meta-analysis: re-treatment of genotype I hepatitis C nonresponders and relapsers after failing interferon and ribavirin combination therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32(8):969-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04427.x. [PubMed: 20937042].
  • 23. Afdhal N, Reddy KR, Nelson DR, Lawitz E, Gordon SC, Schiff E, et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for previously treated HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(16):1483-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1316366. [PubMed: 24725238].
  • 24. Naggie S, Cooper C, Saag M, Workowski K, Ruane P, Towner WJ, et al. Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir for HCV in Patients Coinfected with HIV-1. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(8):705-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501315. [PubMed: 26196665].
  • 25. Zeuzem S, Jacobson IM, Baykal T, Marinho RT, Poordad F, Bourliere M, et al. Retreatment of HCV with ABT-450/r-ombitasvir and dasabuvir with ribavirin. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(17):1604-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401561. [PubMed: 24720679].
  • 26. Miyake Y, Takaki A, Iwasaki Y, Yamamoto K. Meta-analysis: interferon-alpha prevents the recurrence after curative treatment of hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Viral Hepat. 2010;17(4):287-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2009.01181.x. [PubMed: 19732321].
  • 27. Hsu YC, Ho HJ, Wu MS, Lin JT, Wu CY. Postoperative peg-interferon plus ribavirin is associated with reduced recurrence of hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2013;58(1):150-7. doi: 10.1002/hep.26300. [PubMed: 23389758].
  • 28. Harada N, Hiramatsu N, Oze T, Tatsumi T, Hayashi N, Takehara T. Efficacy of pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination therapy for patients with hepatitis C virus infection after curative resection or ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma--A retrospective multicenter study. J Med Virol. 2015;87(7):1199-206. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24173. [PubMed: 25772024].
  • 29. Chang CY, Nguyen P, Le A, Zhao C, Ahmed A, Daugherty T, et al. Real-world experience with interferon-free, direct acting antiviral therapies in Asian Americans with chronic hepatitis C and advanced liver disease. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(6). e6128. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006128. [PubMed: 28178174].
  • 30. Prenner SB, VanWagner LB, Flamm SL, Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Kulik L. Hepatocellular carcinoma decreases the chance of successful hepatitis C virus therapy with direct-acting antivirals. J Hepatol. 2017;66(6):1173-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.01.020. [PubMed: 28161470].
  • 31. Beste LA, Green PK, Berry K, Kogut MJ, Allison SK, Ioannou GN. Effectiveness of hepatitis C antiviral treatment in a USA cohort of veteran patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2017;67(1):32-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.02.027. [PubMed: 28267622].
  • 32. Tammineedi D, Eisert J, Ukken J, Froehlich M, Azab M, Liu X, et al. More extended indication of DAA therapy in patients with HCC, affordability, and further statistical considerations. J Hepatol. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.08.035. [PubMed: 28958883].
  • 33. Wirth TC, Manns MP. The impact of the revolution in hepatitis C treatment on hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(8):1467-74. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw219. [PubMed: 27226385].
  • 34. Hengst J, Falk CS, Schlaphoff V, Deterding K, Manns MP, Cornberg M, et al. Direct-Acting Antiviral-Induced Hepatitis C Virus Clearance Does Not Completely Restore the Altered Cytokine and Chemokine Milieu in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C. J Infect Dis. 2016;214(12):1965-74. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw457. [PubMed: 27683821].
  • 35. Charlton M, Gane E, Manns MP, Brown RS Jr, Curry MP, Kwo PY, et al. Sofosbuvir and ribavirin for treatment of compensated recurrent hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2015;148(1):108-17. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.10.001. [PubMed: 25304641].
  • 36. Forns X, Charlton M, Denning J, McHutchison JG, Symonds WT, Brainard D, et al. Sofosbuvir compassionate use program for patients with severe recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation. Hepatology. 2015;61(5):1485-94. doi: 10.1002/hep.27681. [PubMed: 25557906].
  • 37. MacParland SA, Pham TN, Guy CS, Michalak TI. Hepatitis C virus persisting after clinically apparent sustained virological response to antiviral therapy retains infectivity in vitro. Hepatology. 2009;49(5):1431-41. doi: 10.1002/hep.22802. [PubMed: 19177592].
  • 38. Buonfiglioli F, Conti F, Andreone P, Crespi C, Foschi FG, Lenzi M, et al. Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in HCV Cirrhotic Patients Treated with Direct Acting Antivirals. J Hepatol. 2016;64(2). S215. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(16)00183-5.
  • 39. Ravi S, Axley P, Jones D, Kodali S, Simpson H, McGuire BM, et al. Unusually High Rates of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Treatment With Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C Related Cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(4):911-2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.021. [PubMed: 28161225].
  • 40. Cardoso H, Vale AM, Rodrigues S, Goncalves R, Albuquerque A, Pereira P, et al. High incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma following successful interferon-free antiviral therapy for hepatitis C associated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2016;65(5):1070-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.07.027. [PubMed: 27476768].
  • 41. Zeng QL, Li ZQ, Liang HX, Xu GH, Li CX, Zhang DW, et al. Unexpected high incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C in the era of DAAs: Too alarming? J Hepatol. 2016;65(5):1068-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.07.029. [PubMed: 27476763].
  • 42. Kobayashi M, Suzuki F, Fujiyama S, Kawamura Y, Sezaki H, Hosaka T, et al. Sustained virologic response by direct antiviral agents reduces the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with HCV infection. J Med Virol. 2017;89(3):476-83. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24663. [PubMed: 27531586].
  • 43. Kanwal F, Kramer J, Asch SM, Chayanupatkul M, Cao Y, El-Serag HB. Risk of Hepatocellular Cancer in HCV Patients Treated With Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(4):996-1005 e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.012. [PubMed: 28642197].
  • 44. Li DK, Ren Y, Fierer DS, Rutledge S, Shaikh OS, Lo Re V, et al. The short‐term incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma is not increased after hepatitis C treatment with direct‐acting antivirals: An ERCHIVES study. Hepatol. 2017. doi: 10.1002/hep.29707. [PubMed: 29205416].
  • 45. Ioannou GN, Green PK, Berry K. HCV eradication induced by direct-acting antiviral agents reduces the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.08.030. [PubMed: 28887168].
  • 46. Cheung MCM, Walker AJ, Hudson BE, Verma S, McLauchlan J, Mutimer DJ, et al. Outcomes after successful direct-acting antiviral therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C and decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2016;65(4):741-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.06.019. [PubMed: 27388925].
  • 47. Conti F, Buonfiglioli F, Scuteri A, Crespi C, Bolondi L, Caraceni P, et al. Early occurrence and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV-related cirrhosis treated with direct-acting antivirals. J Hepatol. 2016;65(4):727-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.06.015. [PubMed: 27349488].
  • 48. Rinaldi L, Di Francia R, Coppola N, Guerrera B, Imparato M, Monari C, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV cirrhosis after viral clearance with direct acting antiviral therapy: preliminary evidence and possible meanings. World Canc Res J. 2016;3(3). e748.
  • 49. Nagaoki Y, Imamura M, Aikata H, Daijo K, Teraoka Y, Honda F, et al. The risks of hepatocellular carcinoma development after HCV eradication are similar between patients treated with peg-interferon plus ribavirin and direct-acting antiviral therapy. PLoS One. 2017;12(8). e0182710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182710. [PubMed: 28797106].
  • 50. Strazzulla A, Iemmolo RMR, Carbone E, Postorino MC, Mazzitelli M, De Santis M, et al. The Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Directly Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C Virus Treatment in Liver Transplanted Patients: Is It Real? Hepat Mon. 2016;16(11). e41933. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.41933. [PubMed: 28070200].
  • 51. Reig M, Marino Z, Perello C, Inarrairaegui M, Ribeiro A, Lens S, et al. Unexpected high rate of early tumor recurrence in patients with HCV-related HCC undergoing interferon-free therapy. J Hepatol. 2016;65(4):719-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.04.008. [PubMed: 27084592].
  • 52. Yang JD, Aqel BA, Pungpapong S, Gores GJ, Roberts LR, Leise MD. Direct acting antiviral therapy and tumor recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatitis C-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2016;65(4):859-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.06.023. [PubMed: 27392425].
  • 53. El Kassas M, Funk AL, Salaheldin M, Shimakawa Y, Eltabbakh M, Jean K, et al. Increased recurrence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma after DAA therapy in a hepatitis C-infected Egyptian cohort: A comparative analysis. J Viral Hepat. 2017. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12854. [PubMed: 29274197].
  • 54. Villani R, Facciorusso A, Bellanti F, Tamborra R, Piscazzi A, Landriscina M, et al. DAAs Rapidly Reduce Inflammation but Increase Serum VEGF Level: A Rationale for Tumor Risk during Anti-HCV Treatment. PLoS One. 2016;11(12). e0167934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167934. [PubMed: 27997563].
  • 55. Llovet JM, Villanueva A. Liver cancer: Effect of HCV clearance with direct-acting antiviral agents on HCC. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(10):561-2. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.140. [PubMed: 27580683].
  • 56. Lu Y, Jiang Z, Dai H, Miao R, Shu J, Gu H, et al. Hepatic leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor B4 (LILRB4) attenuates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease via SHP1-TRAF6 pathway. Hepatology. 2018;67(4):1303-19. doi: 10.1002/hep.29633. [PubMed: 29091299].
  • 57. Anrs collaborative study group on hepatocellular carcinoma . Lack of evidence of an effect of direct-acting antivirals on the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma: Data from three ANRS cohorts. J Hepatol. 2016;65(4):734-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.05.045. [PubMed: 27288051].
  • 58. Cabibbo G, Petta S, Calvaruso V, Cacciola I, Cannavo MR, Madonia S, et al. Is early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV cirrhotic patients affected by treatment with direct-acting antivirals? A prospective multicentre study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46(7):688-95. doi: 10.1111/apt.14256. [PubMed: 28791711].
  • 59. Ikeda K, Kawamura Y, Kobayashi M, Kominami Y, Fujiyama S, Sezaki H, et al. Direct-Acting Antivirals Decreased Tumor Recurrence After Initial Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62(10):2932-42. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4739-z. [PubMed: 28884320].
  • 60. Minami T, Tateishi R, Nakagomi R, Fujiwara N, Sato M, Enooku K, et al. The impact of direct-acting antivirals on early tumor recurrence after radiofrequency ablation in hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2016;65(6):1272-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.07.043. [PubMed: 27524465].
  • 61. Torres HA, Vauthey JN, Economides MP, Mahale P, Kaseb A. Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after treatment with direct-acting antivirals: First, do no harm by withdrawing treatment. J Hepatol. 2016;65(4):862-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.05.034. [PubMed: 27255582].
  • 62. Zavaglia C, Okolicsanyi S, Cesarini L, Mazzarelli C, Pontecorvi V, Ciaccio A, et al. Is the risk of neoplastic recurrence increased after prescribing direct-acting antivirals for HCV patients whose HCC was previously cured? J Hepatol. 2017;66(1):236-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.08.016. [PubMed: 27592303].
  • 63. Nguyen K, Jimenez M, Moghadam N, Wu C, Farid A, Grotts J, et al. Decrease of Alpha-fetoprotein in Patients with Cirrhosis Treated with Direct-acting Antivirals. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2017;5(1):43-9. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2016.00057. [PubMed: 28507926].
  • 64. Waziry R, Hajarizadeh B, Grebely J, Amin J, Law M, Danta M, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma risk following direct-acting antiviral HCV therapy: A systematic review, meta-analyses, and meta-regression. J Hepatol. 2017;67(6):1204-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.07.025. [PubMed: 28802876].
  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: