Evaluating Risk Factors for Development of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis in Type-II Diabetes Mellitus

Authors:

Amarapurkar DN
Department of Gastroenterology, Bombay Hospital & Medical Research Center, Mumbai, India

Patel ND
Department of Gastroenterology, Bombay Hospital & Medical Research Center, Mumbai, India

Kamani PM
Department of Gastroenterology, Bombay Hospital & Medical Research Center, Mumbai, India

Correspondence:

Deepak N Amarapurkar, M.D.
Department: Department of Gastroenterology, Bombay Hospital & Medical Research Center
Address: 401 Ameya RBI EMP Co-op Hsg Society New Prabhadevi Road Prabhadevi
City: Mumbai
Country: India
E-mail: amarapurkar@gmail.com
Tel: +91 22 24306262
Fax: +91 22 24368623

Abstract:

Background and Aims: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is reported to be present in 49-86% of patients with type-II diabetes mellitus (DM). Risk factors for the development of NASH in DM are not clear. This prospective analysis was planned to define the chronological relation between DM and NASH as well as to define risk factors for the development of NASH in DM.

Methods: In a 3-year study, all consecutive NASH patients (n=100, age= 42.8±4.6 years, M: F=4.2:1) were evaluated for the presence of DM, at baseline and during three monthly follow-up. In NASH patient with DM (group A, n=27, age=39.3±5.2 years, M: F=4.4:1), risk factors such as obesity, central obesity, dyslipidemia and family history of chronic liver disease were evaluated for  comparative analysis. Similar number of consecutive patients of DM without evidence of liver disease (group B, n=27, age=45.9±5.6 years, M: F=3:1) were analyzed for similar parameters.

Results: Among 100 patients with NASH, 27 (27%) patients had DM of whom, DM was preexisting in 13 (48.1%), was diagnosed at baseline in 11 (40.7%) and was diagnosed during follow-up in 3 (11.1%) patient. On statistical analysis (group A vs. group B), none of the risk factors were found to be statically significant: obesity (77.7% vs. 70.3%), central obesity (88.8% vs. 92.5%), dyslipidemia (51.8% vs. 44.4%), hypolipoproteinemia (7.4% vs. 3.7%), family history of chronic liver disease (7.4% vs. 0%), family history of DM (62.9% vs. 66.6%), hypertension (18.5% vs. 14.8%), ischemic heart disease (7.4% vs. 11.1%), cerebrovascular disease (3.7% vs. 0%) and hyperuricemia (11.1% vs. 14.8%).

Conclusions: DM does not always precede NASH, but may follow NASH in some patients. Risk factors like obesity, central obesity, dyslipidemia and family history do not predict the development of NASH in diabetic patients.

Keywords: Type-II Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis, Chronic Liver Disease

Introduction:

Type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is present in 21-45% of the patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NASH is the commonest cause of chronic liver disease (CLD) in patients with DM (1). Previous studies have shown high prevalence of insulin resistance (IR) and various components of metabolic syndrome (MS) in patients with NASH (2, 3). Despite many studies supporting non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) being a part of the MS, the chronological relationships of NAFLD, IR, MS and DM are not clearly described. It is not clear if one of these conditions causes the others, or if all are consequences of another process (3).

NASH is prevalent in 49-86% of patients with DM (4), but why NASH develops only in some patients and does not develop in others is not known. NASH is a risk factor for progressive CLD, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (5, 6). We have previously tried to explore predictors of fibrosis in NASH with DM; but non-invasive markers were not of much help (4, 5, 7). It is pertinent to know the subset of diabetics predisposed to the development of NASH. In India, incidence of DM is increasing in an epidemic proportion (8). In Indian patients, this is the first study to clarify chronological relationship of NASH and DM as well as to know predisposing factors for NASH in DM.

Materials And Methods:

This 3-year prospective case-control study was divided into two parts, of which first part was an observational study of non-cirrhotic patients with histological diagnosis of NASH; second part being a comparative analysis of DM patients with NASH vs. DM without NASH. The study was approved by the Ethical Review Board of the Institution.

In the first part of the study, 100 consecutive non-cirrhotic patients with histological diagnosis of NASH (age=42.8±4.6 years, M: F=4.2:1, ethnicity: Asian Indian, alcohol consumption=0%, other liver disease=0%) were included. Fasting blood glucose and 2-hour post-glucose/post-prandial glucose level were measured to diagnose DM (ADA criteria) at baseline and at every 3-mothly follow-up during the study period. In the second part of the study, 27 patients with NASH (group A, age=39.3±5.2 years, M: F=4.4:1, ethnicity: Asian Indian), who were identified having diabetes during the first part of the study, were compared to other 27 consecutive non-alcoholic patients of diabetes with no liver disease (group B, age=45.9±5.6 years, M: F=3:1, ethnicity: Asian Indian). In these patients, liver disease was excluded by performing liver function tests and imaging studies. In all patients of group A and group B, following parameters were evaluated: age, sex, family history (DM or chronic liver disease [CLD]), presence of vascular disease (hypertension, ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease), presence of obesity, presence of central obesity (waist circumference, waist: hip ratio), dyslipidemia (total cholesterol [ULN 200 mg/dl], HDL cholesterol [ULN 60 mg/dl], LDL cholesterol [ULN 100 mg/dl], triglyceride [ULN 150 mg/dl], Apo-A1 lipoprotein [normal range: 120-176 mg/dl], Apo-B lipoprotein [normal range: 63-114 mg/dl], Lipoprotein-a [normal range: up to 30 mg/dl]), hyperuricemia (uric acid level [ULN 7.2 mg/dl]).

Diabetes was diagnosed on the basis of use of insulin and/or oral hypoglycemic drugs, fasting plasma glucose level>126 mg/dl and/or 2-hour plasma glucose level>200 mg/dl. Hyperlipidemia was diagnosed when fasting lipid values were above the 95th percentile of normal on at least 2 occasions. Hypolipoproteinemia was diagnosed when lipoprotein Apo-A1 and Apo-B levels were below 95th percentile of the normal range. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg. Obesity was defined when body mass index (BMI)>25 kg/m2. Central obesity was defined in male as waist circumference |"|90 cm or waist-to-hip ratio>0.9 and in female as waist circumference |"|80 cm or waist-to-hip ratio>0.85. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test by comparing both the groups in the second part of the study. P value was considered statistically significant if it was less than 0.05 and P value more than 0.05 was considered statistically not significant.

Results:

In the first part of the study (mean follow-up period: 2.1±0.3 years), of the 100 patients with NASH, diabetes was diagnosed at baseline or during follow-up in 27 patients (27%). In 13 patients (48.1%), diabetes was present before the diagnosis of NASH with mean duration of diabetes being 5.6±2.4 years. In another 11 patients (40.7%), diabetes was diagnosed at the same time of diagnosis of NASH.  In another 3 patients (11.1%) with NASH, diabetes was freshly diagnosed during follow up period.

In the second part of the study, comparison of group A and group B is shown in Table 1. There was a male predominance in both groups, but there was no difference in age distribution. There was no difference in group A and group B regarding the presence of risk factors for NASH or metabolic syndrome, like obesity, central obesity, hypertension and dyslipidemia. In both groups, a significant number of patients had a family history of diabetes (>60%). Complications of atherosclerosis were identically present in both groups.

Table 1. Comparison of risk factors for NASH in both the groups

 

Risk factors

Group A (n=27)

Group B (n= 27)

P value

Age (yrs)

39.3±5.2

45.9±5.6

NS

Sex (M:F)

4.4:1

3:1

NS

Obesity

21 (77.7%)

19 (70.3%)

NS

Central obesity

24 (88.8%)

25 (92.5%)

NS

Dyslipidemia

14 (51.8%)

12 (44.4%)

NS

Hypolipoproteinemia

2 (7.4%)

1 (3.7%)

NS

Hypertension

5 (18.5%)

4 (14.8%)

NS

Ischemic heart disease

2 (7.4%)

3 (11.1%)

NS

Cerebrovascular disease

1 (3.7%)

0 (0%)

NS

Peripheral vascular disease

0 (0%)

1 (0%)

NS

Hyperuricemia, n (%)

3 (11.1%)

4 (14.8%)

NS

Microalbuminuria

8 (28.6%)

7 (25.9%)

NS

Family history of CLD

2 (7.4%)

0 (0%)

NS

Family history of DM

17 (62.9%)

18 (66.6%)

NS

 

Discussion:

Only a few studies have examined the association of baseline liver markers with risk of type 2 diabetes, but the results have been inconsistent (9-13). In 3 recent studies, persons with elevated ALT without any obvious cause were shown to have evidence of developing diabetes during follow-up period as compared to persons without ALT elevation (14-16). NAFLD is the most common cause of chronic elevations of ALT (17, 18). ALT elevation alone is not a good predictor of metabolic significance and severity of NAFLD (5, 19). In one study, on univariate analysis but not on multiple logistic regression, FL on ultrasonography was found to be a risk factor for incident diabetes (20). It seems logical that NAFLD may be a precursor of DM (14). In our study, it is shown that NASH may precede the development of diabetes in some patients.

In general, MS, obesity, and IR are major risk factors in the pathogenesis of NAFLD. Prospective risk factors for the development of MS are physical inactivity, elevated waist circumference and triglyceride levels, elevated |g|-glutamyltransferase, CRP and ALT (21-24). Liver markers were significantly associated with the development of individual components of the metabolic syndrome (14). NASH is associated with risk factors like male sex, low educational level, obesity, central obesity, diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia (hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL cholesterol and hypercholesterolemia), MS, IR, hyperinsulinemia, hypertension, elevated ALT, hyperuricemia (19, 25-28).

In few studies where risk factors for NAFLD in DM are studied, obesity, dyslipidemia and abnormal liver enzymes were associated with diabetic FL (29, 30). In our study there was no correlation between these risk factors and the presence of NASH in DM. Other factors than features of MS might be responsible for NASH in DM. Limitation of our study is application of liver function test and imaging only to exclude NASH in group B as patients with NASH may have normal ALT and normal imaging findings (4, 5). In recent studies, adipokines (adiponectin, resistin, leptin and TNF-a) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of DM and NASH, through their metabolic and pro-/anti-inflammatory activity (22, 27, 31-41). Also, familial clustering of NAFLD, IR and DM is recently an issue of interest (42, 43).

Conclusions:

Diabetes and NASH are linked to each other but their chronological relation is not very clear. In some patients, NASH may precede the development of diabetes. Risk factors like obesity, central obesity, dyslipidemia and family history do not predict the development of NASH in diabetic patients.

References:

1- Amarapurkar D, Das HS. Chronic liver disease in diabetes mellitus. Trop Gastroenterol 2002; 23: 3-5. [PubMed]

2- Amarapurkar DN, Patel ND. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in non-diabetic and non-cirrhotic patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Trop Gastroenterol 2004; 25: 125-9. [PubMed]

3- Li Z, Clark J, Diehl AM. The liver in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Liver Dis 2002; 6: 867-77. [PubMed]

4- Gupte P, Amarapurkar D, Agal S, et al. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 19: 854-8. [PubMed]

5- Amarapurkar DN, Patel ND. Clinical spectrum and natural history of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with normal alanine aminotransferase values. Trop Gastroenterol 2004; 25: 130-4. [PubMed]

6- Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Matteoni CA, Boparai N, McCullough AJ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 262-5. [PubMed]

7- Amarapurka DN, Amarapurkar AD, Patel ND, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with diabetes: predictors of liver fibrosis. Ann Hepatol 2006; 5: 30-3. [PubMed]

8- Iyer SR. Type 2 diabetes express highway, where is the 'U' turn? J Assoc Physicians India 2003; 51: 495-500. [PubMed]

9- Perry IJ, Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG. Prospective study of serum gamma-glutamyltransferase and risk of NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 732-7. [PubMed]

10- Nakanishi N, Nishina K, Li W, Sato M, Suzuki K, Tatara K. Serum gamma-glutamyltransferase and development of impaired fasting glucose or type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Japanese men. J Intern Med 2003; 254: 287-95. [PubMed]

11- Lee DH, Jacobs DR, Jr., Gross M, et al. Gamma-glutamyltransferase is a predictor of incident diabetes and hypertension: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Clin Chem 2003; 49: 1358-66. [PubMed]

12- Lee DH, Ha MH, Kim JH, et al. Gamma-glutamyltransferase and diabetes--a 4 year follow-up study. Diabetologia 2003; 46: 359-64. [PubMed]

13- Ohlson LO, Larsson B, Bjorntorp P, et al. Risk factors for type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Thirteen and one-half years of follow-up of the participants in a study of Swedish men born in 1913. Diabetologia 1988; 31: 798-805. [PubMed]

14- Hanley AJ, Williams K, Festa A, et al. Elevations in markers of liver injury and risk of type 2 diabetes: the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study. Diabetes 2004; 53: 2623-32. [PubMed]

15- Vozarova B, Stefan N, Lindsay RS, et al. High alanine aminotransferase is associated with decreased hepatic insulin sensitivity and predicts the development of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2002; 51: 1889-95. [PubMed]

16- Sattar N, Scherbakova O, Ford I, et al. Elevated alanine aminotransferase predicts new-onset type 2 diabetes independently of classical risk factors, metabolic syndrome, and C-reactive protein in the west of Scotland coronary prevention study. Diabetes 2004; 53: 2855-60. [PubMed]

17- Clark JM, Brancati FL, Diehl AM. The prevalence and etiology of elevated aminotransferase levels in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 960-7. [PubMed]

18- Tiikkainen M, Bergholm R, Vehkavaara S, et al. Effects of identical weight loss on body composition and features of insulin resistance in obese women with high and low liver fat content. Diabetes 2003; 52: 701-7. [PubMed]

19- Chen CH, Huang MH, Yang JC, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in an adult population of Taiwan: metabolic significance of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in nonobese adults. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40: 745-52. [PubMed]

20- Okamoto M, Takeda Y, Yoda Y, Kobayashi K, Fujino MA, Yamagata Z. The association of fatty liver and diabetes risk. J Epidemiol 2003; 13: 15-21. [PubMed]

21- Laaksonen DE, Lakka HM, Salonen JT, Niskanen LK, Rauramaa R, Lakka TA. Low levels of leisure-time physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness predict development of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1612-8. [PubMed]

22- Palaniappan L, Carnethon MR, Wang Y, et al. Predictors of the incident metabolic syndrome in adults: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 788-93. [PubMed]

23- Han TS, Sattar N, Williams K, Gonzalez-Villalpando C, Lean ME, Haffner SM. Prospective study of C-reactive protein in relation to the development of diabetes and metabolic syndrome in the Mexico City Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 2016-21. [PubMed]

24- Nakanishi N, Suzuki K, Tatara K. Serum gamma-glutamyltransferase and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Japanese men. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 1427-32. [PubMed]

25- Zelber-Sagi S, Nitzan-Kaluski D, Halpern Z, Oren R. Prevalence of primary non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a population-based study and its association with biochemical and anthropometric measures. Liver Int 2006; 26: 856-63. [PubMed]

26- Fan JG, Zhu J, Li XJ, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for fatty liver in a general population of Shanghai, China. J Hepatol 2005; 43: 508-14. [PubMed]

27- Wong VW, Hui AY, Tsang SW, et al. Metabolic and adipokine profile of Chinese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 1154-61. [PubMed]

28- Oh SY, Cho YK, Kang MS, et al. The association between increased alanine aminotransferase activity and metabolic factors in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Metabolism 2006; 55: 1604-9. [PubMed]

29- Chen QK, Chen HY, Wang LY, Zeng ZY, Zhou XD. Associated risk factors of fatty liver in the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (in Chinese). Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi 2004; 12: 414-6. [PubMed]

30- Jin HB, Gu ZY, Yu CH, Li YM. Association of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with type 2 diabetes: clinical features and independent risk factors in diabetic fatty liver patients. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2005; 4: 389-92. [PubMed]

31- Yoneda M, Iwasaki T, Fujita K, et al. Hypoadiponectinemia plays a crucial role in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus independent of visceral adipose tissue. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2007; 31: S15-21. [PubMed]

32- Guzik TJ, Mangalat D, Korbut R. Adipocytokines-novel link between inflammation and vascular function? J Physiol Pharmacol 2006; 57: 505-28. [PubMed]

33- Musso G, Gambino R, Durazzo M, et al. Adipokines in NASH: postprandial lipid metabolism as a link between adiponectin and liver disease. Hepatology 2005; 42: 1175-83. [PubMed]

34- Fumeron F, Aubert R, Siddiq A, et al. Adiponectin gene polymorphisms and adiponectin levels are independently associated with the development of hyperglycemia during a 3-year period: the epidemiologic data on the insulin resistance syndrome prospective study. Diabetes 2004; 53: 1150-7. [PubMed]

35- Hui JM, Hodge A, Farrell GC, Kench JG, Kriketos A, George J. Beyond insulin resistance in NASH: TNF-alpha or adiponectin? Hepatology 2004; 40: 46-54. [PubMed]

36- Janke J, Engeli S, Gorzelniak K, Luft FC, Sharma AM. Resistin gene expression in human adipocytes is not related to insulin resistance. Obes Res 2002; 10: 1-5. [PubMed]

37- Chitturi S, Farrell G, Frost L, et al. Serum leptin in NASH correlates with hepatic steatosis but not fibrosis: a manifestation of lipotoxicity? Hepatology 2002; 36: 403-9. [PubMed]

38- Chalasani N, Crabb DW, Cummings OW, et al. Does leptin play a role in the pathogenesis of human nonalcoholic steatohepatitis? Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2771-6. [PubMed]

39- Lopez-Bermejo A, Botas P, Funahashi T, et al. Adiponectin, hepatocellular dysfunction and insulin sensitivity. Clin Endocrinol 2004; 60: 256-63. [PubMed]

40- Snehalatha C, Mukesh B, Simon M, Viswanathan V, Haffner SM, Ramachandran A. Plasma adiponectin is an independent predictor of type 2 diabetes in Asian Indians. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 3226-9. [PubMed]

41- Choi KM, Lee J, Lee KW, et al. Serum adiponectin concentrations predict the developments of type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome in elderly Koreans. Clin Endocrinol 2004; 61: 75-80. [PubMed]

42- Abdelmalek MF, Liu C, Shuster J, Nelson DR, Asal NR. Familial aggregation of insulin resistance in first-degree relatives of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 1162-9. [PubMed]

43- Day CP. The potential role of genes in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Liver Dis 2004; 8: 673-91. [PubMed]