Using Artificial Neural Network to Predict Cirrhosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Infection with Seven Routine Laboratory Findings

Authors:

Vahdani P
Department of Infectious Disease, Shahid Beheshti University, M.C., Tehran, I.R. Iran

Alavian SM
Baqiyatallah Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, I.R. Iran

Aminzadeh Z
Department of Infectious Disease, Shahid Beheshti University, M.C., Tehran, I.R. Iran

Raoufy MR
Department of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, I.R. Iran

Gharibzadeh S
Department of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, I.R. Iran

Vahdani G
Faculty of Medicine, Debresen Hungarian University, Hungary

Fekri S
Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University, M.C., Tehran, I.R. Iran

Eftekhari P
Department of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, I.R. Iran

Correspondence:

Mohammad Reza Raoufy, M.D.
Department: Department of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University
Address: Gisha Bridge
City: Tehran
Country: I.R. Iran
E-mail: raoufy@modares.ac.ir
Tel: +98 21 2258 7755
Fax: +98 21 2258 7755

Abstract:

Background and Aims: Chronic liver diseases could lead to cirrhosis and related complications. Histological diagnosis by liver biopsy has long been the gold standard for assessing the degree of fibrosis and diagnosis of cirrhosis, but it is an invasive procedure with inherent risk and sampling variability. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the artificial neural network (ANN) to predict the presence or absence of cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B by using routine laboratory findings.

Methods: 114 chronic hepatitis B patients who were admitted between 1996 and 2006 at Loghman Hakim hospital and the Tehran Hepatitis Center were evaluated. The disease was confirmed by hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, liver biopsies, and biochemistry values, which were obtained from all of patients. Back propagation ANN analyses were carried out by training the networks with the data. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group (92 patients) included two thirds of the cirrhotic patients (12 patients) and two thirds of the non-cirrhotic patients (80 patients) in a randomized rout.

Results: Ascitis, edema, pruritus, splenomegaly, and hepatomegaly were present in 26.3%, 31.6%, 21.1%, 63.2%, and 0% of cirrhotic patients, respectively, and 0%, 0%, 3.2%, 2.4%, and 0.8% of non-cirrhotic patients, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive ANN values in comparison with liver biopsy in the diagnosis of cirrhotic patients due to chronic HBV were 71.43%, 84.45%, 71.43%, and 95%, respectively.

Conclusions: In chronic hepatitis B patients, if the ANN value of certain laboratory manifestations is negative, there will be a 95% chance of having a negative liver biopsy.

Keywords: Hepatitis B Virus, Chronic Hepatitis, Cirrhosis, Artificial Neural Network

Introduction:

Chronic liver diseases could lead to cirrhosis and related complications. Cirrhosis is the most common non-neoplastic cause of death among hepatobiliary and digestive diseases (1-3). Accurate diagnosis is crucial to the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) or chronic hepatitis C (CHC) (4). Histological diagnosis with liver biopsy has long been the gold standard for assessing the degree of fibrosis and diagnosis of cirrhosis, but it is an invasive procedure with inherent risk and sampling variability (5, 6). In addition, the diagnostic accuracy depends on the size of the biopsy specimens (6, 7). Serum-based tests of liver fibrosis have attracted more attention in recent years. Sim et al. (8) used a simple index of only aspartate transaminases and found that the platelet count was correlated with liver fibrosis. Li et al. (9) studied the effect of coagulation factors and their correlation with the severity of cirrhosis. Some researchers have measured the correlation of cirrhosis with serum transforming growth factor-beta1(10), serumal level of macrophage migration inhibitory factors, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interlukine-6 (IL-6) (11), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels (12). Haydon (13) showed that artificial neural network (ANN) analysis is likely to provide a non-invasive test for diagnosing cirrhosis in HCV-infected patients. ANN analysis is known to be particularly suitable for modeling complex multidimensional relationships (14-16).

 In this study, we assessed the ability of ANN to predict the presence or absence of cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B by using routine laboratory findings.

Materials And Methods:

114 chronic hepatitis B patients, who were admitted between 1996 and 2006 at Loghman Hakim Hospital and the Tehran Hepatitis Center, were evaluated.

The disease was confirmed by HBV DNA and liver biopsies, which were obtained from all patients. Liver biochemistry (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], alkalin phosphatase); prothrombine time (PT); international normalized ratio (INR); platelet count; total and direct bilirubin (Bil); albumin; globulin; cholesterol; glucose; AST/ALT ratio; and AST/platelet ratio were measured in all patients. According to the histopathological diagnosis, the liver disease was grouped as non-cirrhosis or established cirrhosis by the pathologist. Back propagation and ANN analysis were carried out by training the networks with data. Each neuron has a single output but can have multiple inputs. In the model, there were 8 neurons for input, 15 neurons for middle, and one neuron for output. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group (92 patients) included two thirds of the cirrhotic patients (12 patients) and two thirds of the non-cirrhotic patients (80 patients) in a randomized rout. The data from this group were used for training the network by using the significant variables obtained to predict the presence or absence of cirrhosis in this group. The second group (52 patients)   included one third of the cirrhotic patients (7 patients) and one third of the non-cirrhotic patients (45 patients) in a randomized rout. The data from this group were used for testing the network. Then, the data were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the diagnosis of cirrhotic patients.

Results:

Of the 144 patients who were studied, 19 (13.2%) patients had histologically confirmed cirrhosis (3 females, 16 males), and 125 (86.8%) patients had no histological evidence of cirrhosis (23 females, 102 males). Ascitis, edema, pruritus, splenomegaly and hepatomegaly were present in 26.3%, 31.6%, 21.1%, 63.2%, and 0% of the cirrhotic patients, respectively. Ascitis, edema, pruritus, splenomegaly, and hepatomegaly were found in 0%, 0%, 3.2%, 2.4%, and0.8% of the non-cirrhotic patients, respectively. There was a significant correlation between confirmed cirrhosis and ascitis, edema, pruritus, and splenomegaly (P<0.001).The means of the laboratory findings for patients are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. The mean laboratory findings in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.

 

Cirrhosis

Mean

P-value

 

-

63606787.53 ± 36160377.76

0.608

Virus Load

+

9760816.38 ± 7911694.26

-

13.31 ± 0.073

0.000

PT

+

14.89 ± 0.62

-

1.07 ± 0.01

0.000

INR

+

1.45 ± 0.12

-

206147.83 ± 7305.40

0.000

Platelet Count

+

117947.37 ± 12120.13

-

6288.83 ± 149.08

0.094

White blood cell (WBC)

+

7676.84 ± 1878.96

-

93.40 ± 2.31

0.246

Glucose

+

103.07 ± 15.07

-

17.42 ± 1.31

0.052

Blood urea nitrogen (BUN)

+

29.22 ± 10.97

-

108.61 ± 11.42

0.284

ALT

+

75.58 ± 23.33

-

63.48 ± 4.66

0.382

AST

+

76.89 ± 24.84

-

243.20 ± 16.74

0.600

Alkaline phosphatase

+

218.13 ± 24.88

-

1.15 ± 0.11

0.503

Total Bil

+

1.35 ± 0.18

-

0.27 ± 0.01

0.000

Direct Bil

+

0.45 ± 0.053

-

60.72 ± 5.71

0.274

Albumin

+

45.11 ± 2.93

-

120.92 ± 8.04

0.719

Triglyceride (TG)

+

113.43 ± 13.84

-

174.08 ± 4.03

0.236

Cholesterol

+

161.33 ± 11.16

-

20.53 ± 0.71

0.000

Globulin

+

28.70 ± 2.69

-

0.73 ± 0.04

0.000

AST/ALT

+

1.41 ± 0.26

-

0.00033 ± 0.000028

0.001

AST/Platelet Count

+

0.00068 ± 0.00018

Artificial neural network analysis

In the first stage, the ANN analysis was performed by training the networks with Patient Group I and testing their performance on Patient Group II. To allow for a direct comparison, the multiple logistic regression model was also constructed from Group I, and its performance was assessed for Group II. The significant variables between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients were selected as the input layer. Such variables included age (I1) and the mean values of PT (I2), INR (I3), platelet count (I4), direct bilirubin (I5), globulin (I6), AST/ALT (I7), and AST/platelet (I8). The presence of cirrhosis (U1) or non-cirrhosis (U0) was used as the output layer (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Artificial neural network with three layers: input, middle, and output (I1-I8: Input variables, N1-N15:15 neurons in middle layer, U0: no cirrhosis, U1: cirrhosis).

The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of ANN in comparison with liver biopsy in the diagnosis of cirrhotic patients due to chronic HBV are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Comparison of ANN with liver biopsy in the diagnosis of cirrhotic patients due to chronic HBV.

Liver biopsy

ANN result

 

Cirrhosis

 

Non-cirrhosis

 

Total

 

Positive

 

5

 

7

 

12

 

Negative

 

2

 

38

 

40

 

Total

 

7

 

45

 

52

 

Discussion:

The latest American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases practice guidelines on CHB (2004) recommend that patients with HBV DNA concentrations of over 105 copies/mL and persistently or intermittently increased ALT should be evaluated further by liver biopsy (17). Haydon's (13) study showed that ANN analysis could  predict the presence or absence of cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C patients based on a number of host and virus factors, without the need for a liver biopsy and laparoscopy, with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 98.9%. As seen in our research, the sensitivity of ANN of some laboratory manifestations such as PT, INR, platelet count, direct bilirubin, globulin, AST/ALT, and AST/platelet in diagnosing cirrhosis due to chronic HBV was 71.43%, whereas the specificity of the ANN sensitivity value as compared to liver biopsy was 84.45%. Also, the positive predictive value of the ANN value of those laboratory manifestations in comparison with liver biopsy was 71.43%. In other words, if the ANN value of the abovementioned laboratory manifestations is positive in a chronic hepatitis B patient, the patient's liver biopsy will likely be 71.43%. The negative predictive ANN value of the abovementioned laboratory manifestations was 95%. This means if the ANN value of some laboratory manifestations is negative for a chronic HBV patient, there will be a 95% chance of having a negative liver biopsy. Shiomi's (18) research determined artificial neural networks could be useful for the diagnosis of chronic liver diseases from liver scintiscans.

References:

1.  Recommendations for prevention and control of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and HCV-related chronic disease. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1998;47(RR-19):1-39. [PubMed]

2.  El-Serag HB, Mason AC. Risk factors for the rising rates of primary liver cancer in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(21):3227-30. [PubMed]

3.  Befeler AS, Di Bisceglie AM. Hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis and treatment. Gastroenterology. 2002;122(6):1609-19. [PubMed]

4.  Friedman SL. Liver fibrosis -- from bench to bedside. J Hepatol. 2003;38 Suppl 1:S38-53. [PubMed]

5.  Grant A, Neuberger J. Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice. British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut. 1999;45 Suppl 4:IV1-IV11. [PubMed]

6.  Bedossa P, Dargere D, Paradis V. Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003;38(6):1449-57. [PubMed]

7.  Scheuer PJ. Liver biopsy size matters in chronic hepatitis: bigger is better. Hepatology. 2003;38(6):1356-8. [PubMed]

8.  Sim SJ, Cheong JY, Cho SW, et al. [Efficacy of AST to platelet ratio index in predicting severe hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis B virus infection]. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2005;45(5):340-7. [PubMed]

9.  Li Q, Wang BE, Cong YL, et al. [The value of coagulation factors in severity categorization of hepatitis B-related liver cirrhosis]. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2005;44(3):188-90. [PubMed]

10.  Kirmaz C, Terzioglu E, Topalak O, et al. Serum transforming growth factor-beta1(TGF-beta1) in patients with cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis C [corrected]. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2004;15(2):112-6. [PubMed]

11.  Zhang W, Yue B, Wang GQ, Lu SL. Serum and ascites levels of macrophage migration inhibitory factor, TNF-alpha and IL-6 in patients with chronic virus hepatitis B and hepatitis cirrhosis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2002;1(4):577-80. [PubMed]

12.  Lee CZ, Huang GT, Yang PM, Sheu JC, Lai MY, Chen DS. Correlation of HBV DNA levels in serum and liver of chronic hepatitis B patients with cirrhosis. Liver. 2002;22(2):130-5. [PubMed]

13.  Haydon GH, Jalan R, Ala-Korpela M, et al. Prediction of cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection by artificial neural network analysis of virus and clinical factors. J Viral Hepat. 1998;5(4):255-64. [PubMed]

14.  Cross SS, Harrison RF, Kennedy RL. Introduction to neural networks. Lancet. 1995;346(8982):1075-9. [PubMed]

15.  Baxt WG. Application of artificial neural networks to clinical medicine. Lancet. 1995;346(8983):1135-8. [PubMed]

16.  Bos M, Bos A, van der Linden WE. Data processing by neural networks in quantitative chemical analysis. Analyst. 1993;118(4):323-8. [Analyst]

17.  Lok AS, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B: update of recommendations. Hepatology. 2004;39(3):857-61. [PubMed]

18.  Shiomi S, Kuroki T, Kuriyama M, et al. Diagnosis of chronic liver disease from liver scintiscans by artificial neural networks. Ann Nucl Med. 1997;11(2):75-80. [PubMed]