Effects of Pentoxifylline on Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Iran

AUTHORS

Nadieh Baniasadi 1 , Faranak Salajegheh 2 , Abbas Pardakhty 3 , Seyed Mehdi Seyedmirzaee 4 , Mohammad Mahdi Hayatbakhsh 5 , Amin Reza Nikpoor 6 , Mojgan Mohammadi 6 , 7 , *

1 Internal Medicine Department, Bam University of Medical Sciences, Bam, IR Iran

2 Department of Gastroenterology, Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IR Iran

3 Pharmaceutics Research Center, Neuropharmacology Institute, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IR Iran

4 Physiology Research center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IR Iran

5 Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Centre, Institute of Basic and Clinical Physiology Sciences, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IR Iran

6 Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran

7 Immunology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran

How to Cite: Baniasadi N, Salajegheh F, Pardakhty A, Seyedmirzaee S M, Hayatbakhsh M M, et al. Effects of Pentoxifylline on Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Iran, Hepat Mon. 2015 ; 15(11):e58823. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.33462.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Hepatitis Monthly: 15 (11); e58823
Published Online: November 28, 2015
Article Type: Research Article
Received: August 17, 2015
Revised: October 2, 2015
Accepted: October 7, 2015
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a progressive form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Several studies suggest that pentoxifylline (PTX) can improve the disease outcome.

Objectives: We aimed to compare the effect of pentoxifylline with placebo on liver aminotransferases and cytokines, including interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin 8 (IL-8) in patients with NASH.

Patients and Methods: Thirty patients with NASH were included in the study, based on ultrasonography and 1.5-fold mean change from baseline serum levels of liver aminotransferases. Patients with NASH were randomized to receive 1200 mg PTX (the intervention group) or placebo (the placebo group) for 6 months. The serum levels of liver aminotransferases and cytokines were compared between the intervention and placebo groups, at various time points.

Results: The serum levels of liver aminotransferases were significantly reduced at 3 months and at 6 months, compared with baseline, in both groups. The serum levels of IL-6 were significantly decreased, in both groups, only at 6 months, compared with baseline. Compared to the placebo group, the serum level of TNF-α was significantly decreased in the intervention group, at 6 months. The serum level of IL-8 was increased, in both groups, after 6 months, without reaching clinical significance. There was no significant difference in serum levels of liver aminotransferases and cytokines, between intervention and placebo groups.

Conclusions: Decreases in the serum levels of liver aminotransferases and cytokines, in both groups, are related to low-calorie diets and exercise, rather than PTX.

Keywords

Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Cytokines Pentoxifylline Clinical Trial

Copyright © 2015, Kowsar Corp.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Background

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a progressive form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The pathogenesis of NASH is multifactorial, indicating a significant association with inflammation. In its severe form, NASH can lead to cirrhosis, with permanent liver damage (1, 2). Patients with NASH show significantly higher serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), compared with patients with simple steatosis (3). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha is produced by several types of inflammatory cells and tissues, such as monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, endothelial cells, neuronal tissue, T cells, hepatocytes, and Kupffer cells (4). The TNF-α is significantly involved in the development of NASH and NAFLD in animal models and humans (5-8). Interleukin-6 plays a pivotal role in liver pathology and synthesis of acute phase proteins, such as C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A (9). Several reports have shown a confounding influence of IL-6 on NASH. On one hand, IL-6 can improve liver regeneration in IL-6 knockout mice with diet-induced NASH and, on the other hand, it can promote hepatocyte apoptosis in patients with NASH (10-12). Interleukin 8 (IL-8) is produced by peripheral blood mononuclear cells, macrophages, and infiltrated lymphocytes. Jarrar et al. (13) reported that IL-8, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), age, and adiponectin were independently associated with NASH. Pentoxifylline (PTX) is a methylxanthine derivative and an anti‒TNF-α agent, which is reportedLy administered for the treatment of NASH. It can decrease the production of several pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α and shows anti-inflammatory properties, through the inhibition of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) (14-16). The results of several studies, involving the use of PTX in patients with NASH, have shown the effect of PTX in NASH. Published studies have several limitations, due to variation in characterization of patients, such as those with biopsy-proven NASH or NASH based on sonography and ALT and aspartate transaminase (AST) levels. Differences in study designs, such as prospective cohort studies, with control group, or randomized and controlled trials and, also, difference in sample size are other reasons for different findings of studies on the effects of PTX, in patients with NASH (17-24).

2. Objectives

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of PTX for 6 months, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, in patients with NASH, in the city of Kerman, in South-Eastern Iran. The other aims were to assess the effect of PTX on the serum levels of ALT, AST, TNF-α, IL-8, and IL-6 in patients with NASH.

3. Patients and Methods

3.1. Characterization of Patients

Thirty patients with NASH were recruited at the Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Besat Clinic, Kerman, South-Eastern Iran. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant in the study and the study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 declaration of Helsinki. The approval number for the ethics committee was K/91/331. Patients were considered for the study if they had a diagnosis of NASH, based on sonography, and a 1.5-fold mean change from baseline of AST and ALT levels. Patients were excluded if they had a past history of excessive alcohol consumption or any cigarette smoking or narcotics use. Patients were also excluded if they had diabetes and hyperlipidemias. Patients with hypertension (≥ 140/90 mmHg) and those who tested positive for hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B virus infection were also excluded. Additionally, patients were excluded if they had high serum levels of alpha-1-antitrypsin, ceruloplasmin, anti-smooth muscle antibody, and antinuclear antibody. Patients were also excluded if they were taking anti-hypertensive, anti-hyperlipidemic, anti-hyperglycemic medications, or amiodarone or oral contraceptive pills. Patients who were suffering from acute or chronic liver disease were excluded before and during the intervention.

3.2. Study Design and Staging

The study was designed as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Registration ID in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) was IRCT2015033021565N1. Patient enrollment occurred between October 2012 and September 2013. Double blinding was maintained throughout the duration of the randomization phase. The trial was completed in March 2014. The study was designed for 30 patients; 15 patients (frequency: male = 80%, female = 20%, age = 35.7 ± 6.6 years) in the intervention group, who received a PTX dose of 400 mg thrice a day, for 6 months, and 15 patients (male = 80%, female = 20%, age = 39.4 ± 9.4 years) in the placebo group, who received a placebo for 6 months. All patients attended the Gastroenterology Clinic, at Afzalipour Hospital, and were given advice concerning low calorie diet and the importance of daily exercise by a resident in gastroenterology. There were no differences with regard to shape, taste, and color between the placebo and PTX.

The placebo and PTX were labeled by an unblinded pharmacist, as A and B, respectively, before random allocation to the patient. Patients, the medical examiner, laboratory and pharmacy staff did not know the nature of the drugs. On completion of data collection, statistical analysis was performed by a statistician who was unaware of the nature of the compounds represented by A and B. Fifteen untreated healthy subjects were enrolled to determine the serum levels of cytokines, to present a cut-off point when comparing with that of the patients. Demographic data for the 15 controls were as follows: males = 36%, females = 64%. The mean age for control group was (37.37 ± 12.5). The healthy controls, selected from Kerman Blood Transfusion Centre, Kerman, Iran, had no history of systemic or organ specific autoimmune diseases, allergy, infectious diseases, cancer, and metabolic disorders. Laboratory studies were performed to measure levels of AST and ALT, in patients with NASH, at the baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The serum levels of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α were also measured in patients at baseline and 6 months. Weight and height of the patients were measured, to determine body mass index (BMI) at baseline and during the clinical trial at 3 and 6 months. The height of placebo and intervention groups at baseline, 3 months and 6 months was 171.2 ± 9.8 and 172.8 ± 7.2, respectively. The weight of the placebo group at baseline, 3 months and 6 months was 82.2 ± 13, 80.2 ± 13 and 77.7 ± 13.1 kg, respectively, and the weight of the intervention group at baseline, 3 months and 6 months was 80.8 ±12.5, 78.2 ± 13.1 and 73.9 ± 12.7 kg, respectively. The patients were counseled about following a healthy diet and exercise plan. Sampling lasted 6 months. During this period, five patients in the intervention group stopped treatment, four of which because of adverse effects and one for personal reasons. Nine patients in the placebo group stopped treatment, five of which because of problems similar to adverse effects of PTX and four for personal reasons.

3.3. Assessment of Liver Aminotransferases and Serum Cytokines

Liver aminotransferases, including ALT and AST, were measured for patients with NASH by enzymatic photometry. Serum levels of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α were determined for patients with NASH and healthy controls by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bosterbio, Pleasanton, CA, USA).

3.4. Sample Size Calculation

According to the previous study (18), by considering alpha error of 5% and the power of 90% and also employing the formula for two-sample comparison of means, the sample size was calculated to be nine, for each group. We entered 15 patients in each group to enhance the statistical power of study.

3.5. Statistics

Statistical analyses, such as descriptive statistics, repeated measurement test, one-way ANOVA, and independent t-test were performed by SPSS software version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P < 0.05 was considered for statistical significant.

4. Results

The mean ages of the patients in the intervention and placebo groups were 35.7 and 39.4 years, respectively. The difference between the two groups, concerning age, was insignificant (P = 0.220). The means of BMI in the intervention and placebo groups were 26.9 and 26.6, respectively, and the difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.912). Data regarding laboratory parameters and ultrasonography of the liver, for patients with NASH are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Comparison of Laboratory Parameters and Ultrasonography of the Liver Between the Intervention and Placebo Groups at Baseline
ParametersIntervention GroupPlacebo GroupP
Laboratory tests for patients with NASH before starting the treatment
Alkaline phosphatase, U/L218.06 ± 72 83239.60 ± 95.180.492
Triglyceride, mg/dL175.78 ± 65.18142.33 ± 41.180.108
Low density lipoprotein, mg/dL28.70 ± 109.17106.22 ± 24.200.767
High density lipoprotein, mg/dL39.64 ± 13.1842.13 ± 12.500.606
Fasting blood sugar, mmol/L93.42 ± 8.7996.13 ± 20.190.648
Cholesterol, mg/dL174.57 ± 26.93173.93 ± 26.100.582
Ultrasonography of the liver0.014
Fatty liver, mild2 a9 a
Fatty liver, moderate12a6a

aPositive results.

The levels of AST and ALT, measured at the baseline, 3 and 6 months, are presented in Table 2. Results in Table 2 were presented after repeated measure ANOVA with Greenhouse-Geisser correction. Post-hoc tests were performed to obtain mean studied parameters between time points and results were statistically significant after Bonferroni correction.

Table 2. Comparison of Liver Aminotransferases and Body Mass Index at Different Time Points Between the Intervention and Placebo Groupsa
ParametersbBaseline3 Months6 MonthsP
ALT, U/L
Intervention group85.5 ± 38.8c49.0 ± 19.4d37.0 ± 12.60.000
Placebo80.5 ± 31.2c56.9 ± 34.346.5 ± 27.70.001
AST, U/L
Intervention group60.0 ± 27.5c38.2 ± 17.3d27.3 ± 9.30.001
Placebo51.1 ± 13.6c37.2 ± 12.434.8 ± 15.80.001
BMI, kg/m2
Intervention group26.9 ± 3.1e26.1 ± 3.3d25.7 ± 3.40.000
Placebo26.6 ± 7.8c27.6 ± 3.8d27.2 ± 3.70.000

aAbbreviations: ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; BMI, body mass index.

bN = 15.

cSignificant difference was detected from comparison between the baseline and 3 months and also between the baseline and 6 months.

dSignificant difference was detected from comparison between 3 and 6 months.

eSignificant difference was detected from comparison between baseline and 6 months.

There was no significant difference with regard to the serum level of ALT, between the placebo and intervention groups, at baseline (P = 0.217), at 3 months (P = 0.446) or at 6 months (P = 0.236). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the serum level of AST between the groups, at baseline (P = 0.701), at 3 months (P = 0.857) or at 6 months (P = 0.125).

The BMIs obtained at baseline, 3 and 6 months, are presented in Table 2. There was no significant difference in term of BMI between the groups, at baseline (P = 0.912), at 3 months (P = 0.346), and at 6 months (P = 0.391).

The serum levels of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, as mean ± SD, in healthy controls, were 6.3 ± 3.9, 18.0 ± 7.5, and 16.8 ± 11.3 pg/mL, respectively. Levels of these cytokines were significantly higher in patients with NASH, compared with healthy controls. Serum levels of these cytokines were unchanged between baseline and 6 months in the intervention and placebo groups, with the exception of IL-8, where a statistically lower level in the intervention group at baseline had increased at 6 months (Table 3).

Table 3. Comparison Between Serum Levels of Cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) in the Intervention and Placebo Groups and Also Within the Groups at Different Time Pointsa
ParametersbSerum Levels of Cytokines, pg/mL
Baseline6 MonthsP Value
IL-6
Intervention group34.4 ± 26.524.7 ± 22.70.009
Placebo33.5 ± 20.221.2 ± 15.40.045
P Value0.9160.63
IL-8
Intervention group36.1 ± 10.248.2 ± 19.70.478
Placebo46.6 ± 16.849.8 ± 13.10.585
P Value0.0480.789
TNF-α
Intervention group39.2 ± 23.235.1 ± 23.10.028
Placebo42.0 ± 27.331.1 ± 21.20.174
P Value0.7630.626

aAbbreviations: IL-6, Interleukin 6; IL-8, Interleukin 8; TNF‒α, tumor necrosis factor α.

bN = 15.

5. Discussion

Most clinical trials on the effect of PTX in patients with NASH have sufficed to compare the cytokine levels in the intervention and placebo groups, without including the healthy controls. In the present study, patients with NASH had significantly higher serum levels of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, as compared to healthy individuals, which confirmed the important role of inflammation in the pathogenesis and progression of NASH (11, 12). In the present study, PTX decreased the serum levels of liver transferases in patients with NASH, without any significant differences between the intervention and placebo groups. The results of a study by Van Wagner et al. which measured and compared the serum levels of ALT, AST, TNF-α, and IL-6, in patients with NASH during 12 months, shows that their intervention versus placebo clinical trial is in accordance with our findings (25). Lee et al. reported serum levels of liver transferases, as well as serum levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in patients with NASH, which were decreased in intervention and placebo groups in a 3-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (17). They recommended daily exercise and a low-calorie diet to both the groups and reported no significant difference between the groups, with regard to the serum levels of TNF-α, IL-6, AST, and ALT at the end of the clinical trial. Their results are also in agreement with our findings. However, our findings are in disagreement with the results of another randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, which was performed by Buranawui et al. on 32 patients with NASH (26). They reported a significant decrease of ALT and AST in the intervention group, as compared to that in the placebo group. They also stated no significant differences in TNF-α and BMI between the groups, at the end of a 6-month clinical trial, which is in agreement with our findings. Our results are in disagreement with the findings of Zein et al., who showed that liver fibrosis and the histological features of NASH could be improved by PTX administration for one year (27).

Georgescu EF and Georgescu M carried out a non-randomized and uncontrolled prospective study on an outpatient database to determine the efficiency of several agents, including PTX, for the treatment of NASH (19). The BMI, serum levels of ALT, glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, total cholestrol, triglycerides and liver biopsies were determined at baseline and at the end of the treatment. They concluded that PTX showed efficacy in treating non-hypertensive/non-dyslipidemic patients with NASH. However, this study did not control for the confounding effect of dietary and lifestyle interventions.

Li et al. performed a systematic review on the treatment with PTX in patients with NASH until June 2010 (28). They extracted their results from six studies, including two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and four prospective cohort studies. They showed that the serum levels of AST and ALT were significantly decreased in PTX-treated patients. However, there were no significant differences between the serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-α, in the intervention group, as compared to that in the placebo group. They have suggested performing more well-designed, randomized, controlled clinical trials, with a larger sample size, as well as more prospective observational studies, to investigate the effect of PTX in reducing levels of cytokines.

A meta-analysis was recently performed by Du et al., on the effect of PTX in patients with NAFLD (29). They reviewed all relevant controlled trials of the effect of PTX in patients with NAFLD/NASH from 1997 to July 2013. Two prospective cohort studies with controls and three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were included in their meta-analysis. Their findings indicated that PTX administration results in improved liver function and histological changes, as well as weight loss, in patients with NAFLD/NASH. They suggested that PTX may be a novel optional therapy for NAFLD. One study, which was included in their meta-analysis, had a limitation, as the researchers ignored to evaluate the influence of exercise and a low-calorie diet in PTX-treated patients with NASH. The small sample size of several trials and low number of trials were other limitations of the meta-analysis.

Jamali et al. recently performed a clinical trial to evaluate the effect of PTX on liver aminotransferases, in patients with NAFLD (30). They divided 120 patients to two groups and administered PTX to intervention arm. They measured liver aminotransferases at 2 months and 6 months. Although the levels of liver aminotransferases were reduced during the trial in intervention and control groups, their results did not show significant differences between the groups, which are in agreement with our results.

The lack of biopsies from the liver of patients with NASH, as a gold standard confirmation method, was a limitation in our study. Satapathy et al. showed that five out of six patients with NASH improved histologically and with improved liver aminotransferases, particularly ALT, after 12 months of PTX (21). Therefore, they suggested that measurement of liver transferases can be an acceptable criterion for evaluating patients with NASH.

In general, our results suggest that PTX administration does not significantly help in the treatment of patients with NASH. However, other studies show different results and it might be premature to draw conclusions about the efficacy of PTX in the treatment of NASH. Hence, we suggest that a further randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial should be performed, with the enrolment of more patients with NASH from different races, to confirm the effect of PTX on liver aminotransferases, histological findings, and inflammatory cytokines, in patients with NASH. Longer duration and follow up are suggested too. Employment of modern techniques, such as microarray to evaluate and define more inflammatory cytokines genes, which are potentially involved in NASH, may help scientists and clinicians to address the efficacy of PTX therapy on inflammation in the future.

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Dowman JK, Tomlinson JW, Newsome PN. Systematic review: the diagnosis and staging of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 33(5) : 525 -40 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 2.

    Peverill W, Powell LW, Skoien R. Evolving concepts in the pathogenesis of NASH: beyond steatosis and inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2014; 15(5) : 8591 -638 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 3.

    Choi S, Diehl AM. Role of inflammation in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2005; 21(6) : 702 -7 [PubMed]

  • 4.

    Targher G, Arcaro G. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2007; 191(2) : 235 -40 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 5.

    Hotamisligil GS, Arner P, Caro JF, Atkinson RL, Spiegelman BM. Increased adipose tissue expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in human obesity and insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 1995; 95(5) : 2409 -15 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 6.

    Hotamisligil GS. The role of TNFalpha and TNF receptors in obesity and insulin resistance. J Intern Med. 1999; 245(6) : 621 -5 [PubMed]

  • 7.

    Muriel P, Fernandez-Martinez E, Perez-Alvarez V, Lara-Ochoa F, Ponce S, Garcia J, et al. Thalidomide ameliorates carbon tetrachloride induced cirrhosis in the rat. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003; 15(9) : 951 -7 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 8.

    Tilg H, Diehl AM. Cytokines in alcoholic and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343(20) : 1467 -76 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 9.

    Lindmark E, Diderholm E, Wallentin L, Siegbahn A. Relationship between interleukin 6 and mortality in patients with unstable coronary artery disease: effects of an early invasive or noninvasive strategy. JAMA. 2001; 286(17) : 2107 -13 [PubMed]

  • 10.

    Marra F, Gastaldelli A, Svegliati Baroni G, Tell G, Tiribelli C. Molecular basis and mechanisms of progression of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Trends Mol Med. 2008; 14(2) : 72 -81 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 11.

    Perseghin G, Petersen K, Shulman GI. Cellular mechanism of insulin resistance: potential links with inflammation. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003; 27 Suppl 3 -11 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 12.

    Shoelson SE, Lee J, Goldfine AB. Inflammation and insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 2006; 116(7) : 1793 -801 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 13.

    Jarrar MH, Baranova A, Collantes R, Ranard B, Stepanova M, Bennett C, et al. Adipokines and cytokines in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008; 27(5) : 412 -21 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 14.

    Koppe SW, Sahai A, Malladi P, Whitington PF, Green RM. Pentoxifylline attenuates steatohepatitis induced by the methionine choline deficient diet. J Hepatol. 2004; 41(4) : 592 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 15.

    Hernandez E, Correa A, Bucio L, Souza V, Kershenobich D, Gutierrez-Ruiz MC. Pentoxifylline diminished acetaldehyde-induced collagen production in hepatic stellate cells by decreasing interleukin-6 expression. Pharmacol Res. 2002; 46(5) : 435 -43 [PubMed]

  • 16.

    Balibrea JL, Arias-Diaz J, Garcia C, Vara E. Effect of pentoxifylline and somatostatin on tumour necrosis factor production by human pulmonary macrophages. Circ Shock. 1994; 43(2) : 51 -6 [PubMed]

  • 17.

    Lee YM, Sutedja DS, Wai CT, Dan YY, Aung MO, Zhou L, et al. A randomized controlled pilot study of Pentoxifylline in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Hepatol Int. 2008; 2(2) : 196 -201 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 18.

    Tuncer İ, Uygan İ, Dülger H, Türkdoğan K, Şekeroğlu MR, Kösem M. The comparative effects of pentoxifylline and ursodeoxycholic acid on IL-1β, Il-6, Il-8 and TNF-α levels in nonalcoholic fatty liver. Eastyern J Med. 2003; 8 : 27 -32

  • 19.

    Georgescu EF, Georgescu M. Therapeutic options in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Are all agents alike? Results of a preliminary study. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007; 16(1) : 39 -46 [PubMed]

  • 20.

    Adams LA, Zein CO, Angulo P, Lindor KD. A pilot trial of pentoxifylline in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99(12) : 2365 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 21.

    Satapathy SK, Sakhuja P, Malhotra V, Sharma BC, Sarin SK. Beneficial effects of pentoxifylline on hepatic steatosis, fibrosis and necroinflammation in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007; 22(5) : 634 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 22.

    Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: pathologic features and differential diagnosis. Seminars in diagnostic pathology. : 330 -8

  • 23.

    Yeh MM, Brunt EM. Pathology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007; 128(5) : 837 -47 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 24.

    Akriviadis E, Botla R, Briggs W, Han S, Reynolds T, Shakil O. Pentoxifylline improves short-term survival in severe acute alcoholic hepatitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2000; 119(6) : 1637 -48 [PubMed]

  • 25.

    Van Wagner LB, Koppe SW, Brunt EM, Gottstein J, Gardikiotes K, Green RM, et al. Pentoxifylline for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Hepatol. 2011; 10(3) : 277 -86 [PubMed]

  • 26.

    Buranawui W, Thung-u-thaisri P, Pramoolsinsap C. Pentoxifylline for treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a randomized, placebo-controlled study [Abstract s2161]. Gastroenterology A. 2006; 330

  • 27.

    Zein CO, Yerian LM, Gogate P, Lopez R, Kirwan JP, Feldstein AE, et al. Pentoxifylline improves nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Hepatology. 2011; 54(5) : 1610 -9 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 28.

    Li W, Zheng L, Sheng C, Cheng X, Qing L, Qu S. Systematic review on the treatment of pentoxifylline in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Lipids Health Dis. 2011; 10 : 49 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 29.

    Du J, Ma YY, Yu CH, Li YM. Effects of pentoxifylline on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(2) : 569 -77 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 30.

    Jamali R, Dowlatshahi S, Hajatian M. The effect of Pentoxifylline on Liver function tests in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Non-diabetic Patients. Govaresh. 2015; 20(2) : 90 -6

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: