Comparative Evaluation of Immunochromatographic Rapid Diagnostic Tests (Strip and Device) and PCR Methods for Detection of Human Hepatitis B Surface Antigens

AUTHORS

Mohammad Hassan Khadem Ansari 1 , * , Mir Davood Omrani 2 , Vahid Movahedi 2

1 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Urmia School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, [email protected], IR-Iran

2 Department of Cyto-Genetic, Urmia School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, IR-Irani

How to Cite: Ansari M H, Omrani M, Movahedi V. Comparative Evaluation of Immunochromatographic Rapid Diagnostic Tests (Strip and Device) and PCR Methods for Detection of Human Hepatitis B Surface Antigens, Hepat Mon. Online ahead of Print ; 7(2):87-91.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Hepatitis Monthly: 7 (2); 87-91
Article Type: Research Article
Received: June 8, 2007
Accepted: August 18, 2007

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background and Aims: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a leading cause of liver disease worldwide. It is estimated that approximately 350 million people worldwide have chronic HBV infection. In this study, immunochromatographic assays (ICAs) detection methods including rapid tests were compared with serum HBV-DNA detecting by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system.
Methods: 240 patients including 120 samples that were positive with quantitative PCR method and 120 that were negative by either PCR or EIA methods were selected. Samples were examined by strip and device from Intec, Blue Cross, Acon, Atlas, DIMA and Cortez companies compare to the quantitative PCR method as gold standard for detecting HBsAg.
Results: Strip from Intec and Blue Cross, compare to the Acon, Atlas, DIMA and Cortez devices had higher sensitivity in detecting HBsAg in serum. Also positive and negative predictive values of these two strips were higher compare to the rest. In addition true negative value, specificity and positive predictive value of Acon and DIMA strips were higher for detecting HBsAg compare to the rest of the strips.
Conclusions: Rapid diagnostic tests are inexpensive, easy to complete, and impose the minimum discomfort to patients, as well as suitable for case-finding and epidemiological surveillance.  But it should be considered that negative results with strips or device dose not exclude the presence of HBV DNA and therefore one can be use rapid tests as a back up to standard testing methods. Immunochromatographic results should be interpreted with caution, when the sample has relatively low reactivity by PCR method.

Keywords

Hepatitis B Virus PCR Rapid Test

© 0, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

Full Text

Full text is available in PDF

COMMENTS

LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: